This removes the periods from the ends of sentences passed as `expect` messages in recently introduced tests and their helpers, because when called on a `Result`, `Some text: Result info` is better than `Some text.: Result info`. Doing this also improves stylistic consistency with other `expect` messages in the project. I didn't make an analogous change to assertion messages, because the awkward `.:` construction does not arise from them. There may be further refinement that can be done, as the new `expect` messages are still worded as assertions and, as such, could be misread as claiming that the situation they decribe wrongly happened, rather than the intended meaning that it wrongly did not happen. This also changes "key" to "registry key" in one of the `expect` messages so that its meaning is clear in output of big test runs.
Unified · Split
| @@ -388,14 +388,14 @@ mod tests { · 387 unmodified lines | ||
| 388 | 388 | /// [knownfolderid]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/shell/knownfolderid#remarks |
| 389 | 389 | fn obtain_envlessly() -> Self { |
| 390 | 390 | let pf_current = get_known_folder_path(KnownFolder::ProgramFiles) |
| 391 | − .expect("The process architecture specific program files folder is always available."); | |
| 391 | + .expect("The process architecture specific program files folder is always available"); | |
| 392 | 392 | |
| 393 | 393 | let pf_x86 = get_known_folder_path(KnownFolder::ProgramFilesX86) |
| 394 | − .expect("The x86 program files folder will in practice always be available."); | |
| 394 | + .expect("The x86 program files folder will in practice always be available"); | |
| 395 | 395 | |
| 396 | 396 | let maybe_pf_64bit = RegKey::predef(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE) |
| 397 | 397 | .open_subkey_with_flags(r"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion", KEY_QUERY_VALUE) |
| 398 | − .expect("The `CurrentVersion` key exists and allows reading.") | |
| 398 | + .expect("The `CurrentVersion` registry key exists and allows reading") | |
| 399 | 399 | .get_value::<OsString, _>("ProgramW6432Dir") |
| 400 | 400 | .map(PathBuf::from) |
| 401 | 401 | .map_err(|error| { |
| @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ mod tests { · 14 unmodified lines | ||
| 416 | 416 | /// This checks that `obtain_envlessly()` returned paths that are likely to be correct and |
| 417 | 417 | /// that satisfy the most important properties based on the current system and process. |
| 418 | 418 | fn validate(self) -> Self { |
| 419 | − match PlatformArchitecture::current().expect("Process and system 'bitness' should be available.") { | |
| 419 | + match PlatformArchitecture::current().expect("Process and system 'bitness' should be available") { | |
| 420 | 420 | PlatformArchitecture::Is32on32 => { |
| 421 | 421 | assert_eq!( |
| 422 | 422 | self.current.as_os_str(), |
| @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ mod tests { · 2 unmodified lines | ||
| 425 | 425 | ); |
| 426 | 426 | for trailing_arch in [" (x86)", " (Arm)"] { |
| 427 | 427 | let is_adorned = ends_with_case_insensitive(self.current.as_os_str(), trailing_arch) |
| 428 | − .expect("Assume the test system's important directories are valid Unicode."); | |
| 428 | + .expect("Assume the test system's important directories are valid Unicode"); | |
| 429 | 429 | assert!( |
| 430 | 430 | !is_adorned, |
| 431 | 431 | "The 32-bit program files directory name on a 32-bit system mentions no architecture.", |
| @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ mod tests { · 13 unmodified lines | ||
| 445 | 445 | let pf_64bit = self |
| 446 | 446 | .maybe_64bit |
| 447 | 447 | .as_ref() |
| 448 | − .expect("The 64-bit program files directory exists."); | |
| 448 | + .expect("The 64-bit program files directory exists"); | |
| 449 | 449 | assert_ne!( |
| 450 | 450 | &self.x86, pf_64bit, |
| 451 | 451 | "The 32-bit and 64-bit program files directories have different locations.", |
| @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ mod tests { · 3 unmodified lines | ||
| 455 | 455 | let pf_64bit = self |
| 456 | 456 | .maybe_64bit |
| 457 | 457 | .as_ref() |
| 458 | − .expect("The 64-bit program files directory exists."); | |
| 458 | + .expect("The 64-bit program files directory exists"); | |
| 459 | 459 | assert_eq!( |
| 460 | 460 | self.current.as_os_str(), |
| 461 | 461 | pf_64bit.as_os_str(), |
| @@ -487,13 +487,13 @@ mod tests { · 25 unmodified lines | ||
| 487 | 487 | let prefix_64bit = pf |
| 488 | 488 | .maybe_64bit |
| 489 | 489 | .as_ref() |
| 490 | − .expect("It gives two paths only if one can be 64-bit."); | |
| 490 | + .expect("It gives two paths only if one can be 64-bit"); | |
| 491 | 491 | let suffix_64bit = primary |
| 492 | 492 | .strip_prefix(prefix_64bit) |
| 493 | − .expect("It gives the 64-bit path and lists it first."); | |
| 493 | + .expect("It gives the 64-bit path and lists it first"); | |
| 494 | 494 | let suffix_x86 = secondary |
| 495 | 495 | .strip_prefix(pf.x86.as_path()) |
| 496 | − .expect("It gives the 32-bit path and lists it second."); | |
| 496 | + .expect("It gives the 32-bit path and lists it second"); | |
| 497 | 497 | Self { |
| 498 | 498 | x86: suffix_x86, |
| 499 | 499 | maybe_64bit: Some(suffix_64bit), |
| @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ mod tests { · 3 unmodified lines | ||
| 503 | 503 | assert_eq!(pf.maybe_64bit, None, "It gives one path only if none can be 64-bit."); |
| 504 | 504 | let suffix_x86 = only |
| 505 | 505 | .strip_prefix(pf.x86.as_path()) |
| 506 | − .expect("The one path it gives is the 32-bit path."); | |
| 506 | + .expect("The one path it gives is the 32-bit path"); | |
| 507 | 507 | Self { |
| 508 | 508 | x86: suffix_x86, |
| 509 | 509 | maybe_64bit: None, |