History

bpf: Fix propagation of 32 bit unsigned bounds from 64 bit bounds

Similarly as b02709587ea3 ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32-bit signed bounds from 64-bit bounds."), we also need to fix the propagation of 32 bit unsigned bounds from 64 bit counterparts. That is, really only set the u32_{min,max}_value when /both/ {umin,umax}_value safely fit in 32 bit space. For example, the register with a umin_value == 1 does /not/ imply that u32_min_value is also equal to 1, since umax_value could be much larger than 32 bit subregister can hold, and thus u32_min_value is in the interval [0,1] instead. Before fix, invalid tracking result of R2_w=inv1: [...] 5: R0_w=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 5: (35) if r2 >= 0x1 goto pc+1 [...] // goto path 7: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,umin_value=1) R10=fp0 7: (b6) if w2 <= 0x1 goto pc+1 [...] // goto path 9: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,smin_value=-9223372036854775807,smax_value=9223372032559808513,umin_value=1,umax_value=18446744069414584321,var_off=(0x1; 0xffffffff00000000),s32_min_value=1,s32_max_value=1,u32_max_value=1) R10=fp0 9: (bc) w2 = w2 10: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv1 R10=fp0 [...] After fix, correct tracking result of R2_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)): [...] 5: R0_w=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 5: (35) if r2 >= 0x1 goto pc+1 [...] // goto path 7: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,umin_value=1) R10=fp0 7: (b6) if w2 <= 0x1 goto pc+1 [...] // goto path 9: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372032559808513,umax_value=18446744069414584321,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000001),s32_min_value=0,s32_max_value=1,u32_max_value=1) R10=fp0 9: (bc) w2 = w2 10: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)) R10=fp0 [...] Thus, same issue as in b02709587ea3 holds for unsigned subregister tracking. Also, align __reg64_bound_u32() similarly to __reg64_bound_s32() as done in b02709587ea3 to make them uniform again.

Daniel Borkmann committed 5 years ago

Commit 10bf4e81 parent 38d26d82 files · +4 −6Browse files

Showing the changes to kernel (1 of 2 files). Show all

Unified · Split

kernel/bpf/verifier.c+3−5
@@ -1398,9 +1398,7 @@ static bool __reg64_bound_s32(s64 a) · 1397 unmodified lines
13981398
13991399 static bool __reg64_bound_u32(u64 a)
14001400 {
1401− if (a > U32_MIN && a < U32_MAX)
1402− return true;
1403− return false;
1401+ return a > U32_MIN && a < U32_MAX;
14041402 }
14051403
14061404 static void __reg_combine_64_into_32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
@@ -1411,10 +1409,10 @@ static void __reg_combine_64_into_32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) · 4 unmodified lines
14111409 reg->s32_min_value = (s32)reg->smin_value;
14121410 reg->s32_max_value = (s32)reg->smax_value;
14131411 }
1414− if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value))
1412+ if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value) && __reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value)) {
14151413 reg->u32_min_value = (u32)reg->umin_value;
1416− if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value))
14171414 reg->u32_max_value = (u32)reg->umax_value;
1415+ }
14181416
14191417 /* Intersecting with the old var_off might have improved our bounds
14201418 * slightly. e.g. if umax was 0x7f...f and var_off was (0; 0xf...fc),

Keyboard shortcuts

General

Show keyboard shortcuts
?
Focus the current search
/

Issues and pull requests

Open filters
f

Issues, pull requests and Inbox

Select next item
j↓
Select previous item
k↑
Open selected item
Enter
Dismiss filters or clear selection
Esc

Repository code

Go to file
t