The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Unified · Split
| @@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ struct net_dm_config_entry { · 28 unmodified lines | |||
| 29 | 29 | ||
| 30 | struct net_dm_config_msg { | 30 | struct net_dm_config_msg { |
| 31 | __u32 entries; | 31 | __u32 entries; |
| 32 | struct net_dm_config_entry options[0]; | 32 | struct net_dm_config_entry options[]; |
| 33 | }; | 33 | }; |
| 34 | 34 | ||
| 35 | struct net_dm_alert_msg { | 35 | struct net_dm_alert_msg { |
| 36 | __u32 entries; | 36 | __u32 entries; |
| 37 | struct net_dm_drop_point points[0]; | 37 | struct net_dm_drop_point points[]; |
| 38 | }; | 38 | }; |
| 39 | 39 | ||
| 40 | struct net_dm_user_msg { | 40 | struct net_dm_user_msg { |