History

workqueue: remove the stale comment in pwq_unbound_release_workfn()

In 75ccf5950f82 ("workqueue: prepare flush_workqueue() for dynamic creation and destrucion of unbound pool_workqueues"), a comment about the synchronization for the pwq in pwq_unbound_release_workfn() was added. The comment claimed the flush_mutex wasn't strictly necessary, it was correct in that time, due to the pwq was protected by workqueue_lock. But it is incorrect now since the wq->flush_mutex was renamed to wq->mutex and workqueue_lock was removed, the wq->mutex is strictly needed. But the comment was miss-updated when the synchronization was changed. This patch removes the incorrect comments and doesn't add any new comment to explain why wq->mutex is needed here, which is definitely obvious and wq->pwqs_node has "WQ" notation in its definition which is better comment. The old commit mentioned above also introduced a comment in link_pwq() about the synchronization. This comment is also removed in this patch since the whole link_pwq() is proteced by wq->mutex.

Lai Jiangshan committed 12 years ago

Commit 29b1cb41 parent 13b1d621 file · +1 −9Browse files

Showing the changes to kernel/workqueue.c (1 of 1 file). Show all

Unified · Split

kernel/workqueue.c+1−9
@@ -3530,11 +3530,6 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work) · 3529 unmodified lines
35303530 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)))
35313531 return;
35323532
3533− /*
3534− * Unlink @pwq. Synchronization against wq->mutex isn't strictly
3535− * necessary on release but do it anyway. It's easier to verify
3536− * and consistent with the linking path.
3537− */
35383533 mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
35393534 list_del_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node);
35403535 is_last = list_empty(&wq->pwqs);
@@ -3631,10 +3626,7 @@ static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq) · 90 unmodified lines
36313626 if (!list_empty(&pwq->pwqs_node))
36323627 return;
36333628
3634− /*
3635− * Set the matching work_color. This is synchronized with
3636− * wq->mutex to avoid confusing flush_workqueue().
3637− */
3629+ /* set the matching work_color */
36383630 pwq->work_color = wq->work_color;
36393631
36403632 /* sync max_active to the current setting */