Stephen Rothwell reported this linux-next build failure: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160226164406.065a1ffc@canb.auug.org.au ... caused by the Memory Protection Keys patches from the tip tree triggering a newly introduced build-time sanity check on an ARM build, because they changed the ABI of siginfo in an unexpected way. If u64 has a natural alignment of 8 bytes (which is the case on most mainstream platforms, with the notable exception of x86-32), then the leadup to the _sifields union matters: typedef struct siginfo { int si_signo; int si_errno; int si_code; union { ... } _sifields; } __ARCH_SI_ATTRIBUTES siginfo_t; Note how the first 3 fields give us 12 bytes, so _sifields is not 8 naturally bytes aligned. Before the _pkey field addition the largest element of _sifields (on 32-bit platforms) was 32 bits. With the u64 added, the minimum alignment requirement increased to 8 bytes on those (rare) 32-bit platforms. Thus GCC padded the space after si_code with 4 extra bytes, and shifted all _sifields offsets by 4 bytes - breaking the ABI of all of those remaining fields. On 64-bit platforms this problem was hidden due to _sifields already having numerous fields with natural 8 bytes alignment (pointers). To fix this, we replace the u64 with an '__u32'. The __u32 does not increase the minimum alignment requirement of the union, and it is also large enough to store the 16-bit pkey we have today on x86.
Showing the changes to include/uapi (1 of 3 files). Show all
Unified · Split
| @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ typedef struct siginfo { · 97 unmodified lines | ||
| 98 | 98 | void __user *_upper; |
| 99 | 99 | } _addr_bnd; |
| 100 | 100 | /* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */ |
| 101 | − u64 _pkey; | |
| 101 | + __u32 _pkey; | |
| 102 | 102 | }; |
| 103 | 103 | } _sigfault; |
| 104 | 104 | |