History

bpf: verifier: mark verified-insn with sub-register zext flag

eBPF ISA specification requires high 32-bit cleared when low 32-bit sub-register is written. This applies to destination register of ALU32 etc. JIT back-ends must guarantee this semantic when doing code-gen. x86_64 and AArch64 ISA has the same semantics, so the corresponding JIT back-end doesn't need to do extra work. However, 32-bit arches (arm, x86, nfp etc.) and some other 64-bit arches (PowerPC, SPARC etc) need to do explicit zero extension to meet this requirement, otherwise code like the following will fail. u64_value = (u64) u32_value ... other uses of u64_value This is because compiler could exploit the semantic described above and save those zero extensions for extending u32_value to u64_value, these JIT back-ends are expected to guarantee this through inserting extra zero extensions which however could be a significant increase on the code size. Some benchmarks show there could be ~40% sub-register writes out of total insns, meaning at least ~40% extra code-gen. One observation is these extra zero extensions are not always necessary. Take above code snippet for example, it is possible u32_value will never be casted into a u64, the value of high 32-bit of u32_value then could be ignored and extra zero extension could be eliminated. This patch implements this idea, insns defining sub-registers will be marked when the high 32-bit of the defined sub-register matters. For those unmarked insns, it is safe to eliminate high 32-bit clearnace for them. Algo: - Split read flags into READ32 and READ64. - Record index of insn that does sub-register write. Keep the index inside reg state and update it during verifier insn walking. - A full register read on a sub-register marks its definition insn as needing zero extension on dst register. A new sub-register write overrides the old one. - When propagating read64 during path pruning, also mark any insn defining a sub-register that is read in the pruned path as full-register.

Jiong Wang committed 7 years ago

Commit 5327ed31 parent a08acd12 files · +171 −16Browse files

Unified · Split

2 files
  1. include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +11 −3
  2. kernel/bpf/verifier.c +160 −13
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h+11−3
@@ -36,9 +36,11 @@ · 35 unmodified lines
3636 */
3737 enum bpf_reg_liveness {
3838 REG_LIVE_NONE = 0, /* reg hasn't been read or written this branch */
39− REG_LIVE_READ, /* reg was read, so we're sensitive to initial value */
40− REG_LIVE_WRITTEN, /* reg was written first, screening off later reads */
41− REG_LIVE_DONE = 4, /* liveness won't be updating this register anymore */
39+ REG_LIVE_READ32 = 0x1, /* reg was read, so we're sensitive to initial value */
40+ REG_LIVE_READ64 = 0x2, /* likewise, but full 64-bit content matters */
41+ REG_LIVE_READ = REG_LIVE_READ32 | REG_LIVE_READ64,
42+ REG_LIVE_WRITTEN = 0x4, /* reg was written first, screening off later reads */
43+ REG_LIVE_DONE = 0x8, /* liveness won't be updating this register anymore */
4244 };
4345
4446 struct bpf_reg_state {
@@ -131,6 +133,11 @@ struct bpf_reg_state { · 86 unmodified lines
131133 * pointing to bpf_func_state.
132134 */
133135 u32 frameno;
136+ /* Tracks subreg definition. The stored value is the insn_idx of the
137+ * writing insn. This is safe because subreg_def is used before any insn
138+ * patching which only happens after main verification finished.
139+ */
140+ s32 subreg_def;
134141 enum bpf_reg_liveness live;
135142 };
136143
@@ -233,6 +240,7 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data { · 96 unmodified lines
233240 int ctx_field_size; /* the ctx field size for load insn, maybe 0 */
234241 int sanitize_stack_off; /* stack slot to be cleared */
235242 bool seen; /* this insn was processed by the verifier */
243+ bool zext_dst; /* this insn zero extends dst reg */
236244 u8 alu_state; /* used in combination with alu_limit */
237245 bool prune_point;
238246 unsigned int orig_idx; /* original instruction index */
kernel/bpf/verifier.c+160−13
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 981 unmodified lines
982982 __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno);
983983 }
984984
985+#define DEF_NOT_SUBREG (0)
985986 static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
986987 struct bpf_func_state *state)
987988 {
@@ -992,6 +993,7 @@ static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 4 unmodified lines
992993 mark_reg_not_init(env, regs, i);
993994 regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE;
994995 regs[i].parent = NULL;
996+ regs[i].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
995997 }
996998
997999 /* frame pointer */
@@ -1137,7 +1139,7 @@ next: · 139 unmodified lines
11371139 */
11381140 static int mark_reg_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
11391141 const struct bpf_reg_state *state,
1140− struct bpf_reg_state *parent)
1142+ struct bpf_reg_state *parent, u8 flag)
11411143 {
11421144 bool writes = parent == state->parent; /* Observe write marks */
11431145 int cnt = 0;
@@ -1152,17 +1154,26 @@ static int mark_reg_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 8 unmodified lines
11521154 parent->var_off.value, parent->off);
11531155 return -EFAULT;
11541156 }
1155− if (parent->live & REG_LIVE_READ)
1157+ /* The first condition is more likely to be true than the
1158+ * second, checked it first.
1159+ */
1160+ if ((parent->live & REG_LIVE_READ) == flag ||
1161+ parent->live & REG_LIVE_READ64)
11561162 /* The parentage chain never changes and
11571163 * this parent was already marked as LIVE_READ.
11581164 * There is no need to keep walking the chain again and
11591165 * keep re-marking all parents as LIVE_READ.
11601166 * This case happens when the same register is read
11611167 * multiple times without writes into it in-between.
1168+ * Also, if parent has the stronger REG_LIVE_READ64 set,
1169+ * then no need to set the weak REG_LIVE_READ32.
11621170 */
11631171 break;
11641172 /* ... then we depend on parent's value */
1165− parent->live |= REG_LIVE_READ;
1173+ parent->live |= flag;
1174+ /* REG_LIVE_READ64 overrides REG_LIVE_READ32. */
1175+ if (flag == REG_LIVE_READ64)
1176+ parent->live &= ~REG_LIVE_READ32;
11661177 state = parent;
11671178 parent = state->parent;
11681179 writes = true;
@@ -1174,12 +1185,111 @@ static int mark_reg_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 5 unmodified lines
11741185 return 0;
11751186 }
11761187
1188+/* This function is supposed to be used by the following 32-bit optimization
1189+ * code only. It returns TRUE if the source or destination register operates
1190+ * on 64-bit, otherwise return FALSE.
1191+ */
1192+static bool is_reg64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
1193+ u32 regno, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, enum reg_arg_type t)
1194+{
1195+ u8 code, class, op;
1196+
1197+ code = insn->code;
1198+ class = BPF_CLASS(code);
1199+ op = BPF_OP(code);
1200+ if (class == BPF_JMP) {
1201+ /* BPF_EXIT for "main" will reach here. Return TRUE
1202+ * conservatively.
1203+ */
1204+ if (op == BPF_EXIT)
1205+ return true;
1206+ if (op == BPF_CALL) {
1207+ /* BPF to BPF call will reach here because of marking
1208+ * caller saved clobber with DST_OP_NO_MARK for which we
1209+ * don't care the register def because they are anyway
1210+ * marked as NOT_INIT already.
1211+ */
1212+ if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
1213+ return false;
1214+ /* Helper call will reach here because of arg type
1215+ * check, conservatively return TRUE.
1216+ */
1217+ if (t == SRC_OP)
1218+ return true;
1219+
1220+ return false;
1221+ }
1222+ }
1223+
1224+ if (class == BPF_ALU64 || class == BPF_JMP ||
1225+ /* BPF_END always use BPF_ALU class. */
1226+ (class == BPF_ALU && op == BPF_END && insn->imm == 64))
1227+ return true;
1228+
1229+ if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_JMP32)
1230+ return false;
1231+
1232+ if (class == BPF_LDX) {
1233+ if (t != SRC_OP)
1234+ return BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW;
1235+ /* LDX source must be ptr. */
1236+ return true;
1237+ }
1238+
1239+ if (class == BPF_STX) {
1240+ if (reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE)
1241+ return true;
1242+ return BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW;
1243+ }
1244+
1245+ if (class == BPF_LD) {
1246+ u8 mode = BPF_MODE(code);
1247+
1248+ /* LD_IMM64 */
1249+ if (mode == BPF_IMM)
1250+ return true;
1251+
1252+ /* Both LD_IND and LD_ABS return 32-bit data. */
1253+ if (t != SRC_OP)
1254+ return false;
1255+
1256+ /* Implicit ctx ptr. */
1257+ if (regno == BPF_REG_6)
1258+ return true;
1259+
1260+ /* Explicit source could be any width. */
1261+ return true;
1262+ }
1263+
1264+ if (class == BPF_ST)
1265+ /* The only source register for BPF_ST is a ptr. */
1266+ return true;
1267+
1268+ /* Conservatively return true at default. */
1269+ return true;
1270+}
1271+
1272+static void mark_insn_zext(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
1273+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
1274+{
1275+ s32 def_idx = reg->subreg_def;
1276+
1277+ if (def_idx == DEF_NOT_SUBREG)
1278+ return;
1279+
1280+ env->insn_aux_data[def_idx - 1].zext_dst = true;
1281+ /* The dst will be zero extended, so won't be sub-register anymore. */
1282+ reg->subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
1283+}
1284+
11771285 static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
11781286 enum reg_arg_type t)
11791287 {
11801288 struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state;
11811289 struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe];
1290+ struct bpf_insn *insn = env->prog->insnsi + env->insn_idx;
11821291 struct bpf_reg_state *reg, *regs = state->regs;
1292+ bool rw64;
11831293
11841294 if (regno >= MAX_BPF_REG) {
11851295 verbose(env, "R%d is invalid\n", regno);
@@ -1187,6 +1297,7 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, · 1 unmodified line
11871297 }
11881298
11891299 reg = &regs[regno];
1300+ rw64 = is_reg64(env, insn, regno, reg, t);
11901301 if (t == SRC_OP) {
11911302 /* check whether register used as source operand can be read */
11921303 if (reg->type == NOT_INIT) {
@@ -1197,7 +1308,11 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, · 4 unmodified lines
11971308 if (regno == BPF_REG_FP)
11981309 return 0;
11991310
1200− return mark_reg_read(env, reg, reg->parent);
1311+ if (rw64)
1312+ mark_insn_zext(env, reg);
1313+
1314+ return mark_reg_read(env, reg, reg->parent,
1315+ rw64 ? REG_LIVE_READ64 : REG_LIVE_READ32);
12011316 } else {
12021317 /* check whether register used as dest operand can be written to */
12031318 if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) {
@@ -1205,6 +1320,7 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, · 1 unmodified line
12051320 return -EACCES;
12061321 }
12071322 reg->live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
1323+ reg->subreg_def = rw64 ? DEF_NOT_SUBREG : env->insn_idx + 1;
12081324 if (t == DST_OP)
12091325 mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, regno);
12101326 }
@@ -1384,7 +1500,8 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 173 unmodified lines
13841500 state->regs[value_regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
13851501 }
13861502 mark_reg_read(env, &reg_state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr,
1387− reg_state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent);
1503+ reg_state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent,
1504+ REG_LIVE_READ64);
13881505 return 0;
13891506 } else {
13901507 int zeros = 0;
@@ -1401,7 +1518,8 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 10 unmodified lines
14011518 return -EACCES;
14021519 }
14031520 mark_reg_read(env, &reg_state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr,
1404− reg_state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent);
1521+ reg_state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent,
1522+ REG_LIVE_READ64);
14051523 if (value_regno >= 0) {
14061524 if (zeros == size) {
14071525 /* any size read into register is zero extended,
@@ -2110,6 +2228,12 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn · 702 unmodified lines
21102228 value_regno);
21112229 if (reg_type_may_be_null(reg_type))
21122230 regs[value_regno].id = ++env->id_gen;
2231+ /* A load of ctx field could have different
2232+ * actual load size with the one encoded in the
2233+ * insn. When the dst is PTR, it is for sure not
2234+ * a sub-register.
2235+ */
2236+ regs[value_regno].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
21132237 }
21142238 regs[value_regno].type = reg_type;
21152239 }
@@ -2369,7 +2493,8 @@ mark: · 253 unmodified lines
23692493 * the whole slot to be marked as 'read'
23702494 */
23712495 mark_reg_read(env, &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr,
2372− state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent);
2496+ state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent,
2497+ REG_LIVE_READ64);
23732498 }
23742499 return update_stack_depth(env, state, min_off);
23752500 }
@@ -3333,6 +3458,9 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn · 957 unmodified lines
33333458 check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK);
33343459 }
33353460
3461+ /* helper call returns 64-bit value. */
3462+ regs[BPF_REG_0].subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
3463+
33363464 /* update return register (already marked as written above) */
33373465 if (fn->ret_type == RET_INTEGER) {
33383466 /* sets type to SCALAR_VALUE */
@@ -4264,6 +4392,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) · 925 unmodified lines
42644392 */
42654393 *dst_reg = *src_reg;
42664394 dst_reg->live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
4395+ dst_reg->subreg_def = DEF_NOT_SUBREG;
42674396 } else {
42684397 /* R1 = (u32) R2 */
42694398 if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) {
@@ -4274,6 +4403,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) · 4 unmodified lines
42744403 } else if (src_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
42754404 *dst_reg = *src_reg;
42764405 dst_reg->live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
4406+ dst_reg->subreg_def = env->insn_idx + 1;
42774407 } else {
42784408 mark_reg_unknown(env, regs,
42794409 insn->dst_reg);
@@ -5353,6 +5483,8 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) · 1073 unmodified lines
53535483 * Already marked as written above.
53545484 */
53555485 mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
5486+ /* ld_abs load up to 32-bit skb data. */
5487+ regs[BPF_REG_0].subreg_def = env->insn_idx + 1;
53565488 return 0;
53575489 }
53585490
@@ -6309,20 +6441,33 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 950 unmodified lines
63096441 return true;
63106442 }
63116443
6444+/* Return 0 if no propagation happened. Return negative error code if error
6445+ * happened. Otherwise, return the propagated bit.
6446+ */
63126447 static int propagate_liveness_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
63136448 struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
63146449 struct bpf_reg_state *parent_reg)
63156450 {
6451+ u8 parent_flag = parent_reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ;
6452+ u8 flag = reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ;
63166453 int err;
63176454
6318− if (parent_reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ || !(reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ))
6455+ /* When comes here, read flags of PARENT_REG or REG could be any of
6456+ * REG_LIVE_READ64, REG_LIVE_READ32, REG_LIVE_NONE. There is no need
6457+ * of propagation if PARENT_REG has strongest REG_LIVE_READ64.
6458+ */
6459+ if (parent_flag == REG_LIVE_READ64 ||
6460+ /* Or if there is no read flag from REG. */
6461+ !flag ||
6462+ /* Or if the read flag from REG is the same as PARENT_REG. */
6463+ parent_flag == flag)
63196464 return 0;
63206465
6321− err = mark_reg_read(env, reg, parent_reg);
6466+ err = mark_reg_read(env, reg, parent_reg, flag);
63226467 if (err)
63236468 return err;
63246469
6325− return 0;
6470+ return flag;
63266471 }
63276472
63286473 /* A write screens off any subsequent reads; but write marks come from the
@@ -6356,8 +6501,10 @@ static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 27 unmodified lines
63566501 for (i = frame < vstate->curframe ? BPF_REG_6 : 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) {
63576502 err = propagate_liveness_reg(env, &state_reg[i],
63586503 &parent_reg[i]);
6359− if (err)
6504+ if (err < 0)
63606505 return err;
6506+ if (err == REG_LIVE_READ64)
6507+ mark_insn_zext(env, &parent_reg[i]);
63616508 }
63626509
63636510 /* Propagate stack slots. */
@@ -6367,11 +6514,11 @@ static int propagate_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, · 3 unmodified lines
63676514 state_reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr;
63686515 err = propagate_liveness_reg(env, state_reg,
63696516 parent_reg);
6370− if (err)
6517+ if (err < 0)
63716518 return err;
63726519 }
63736520 }
6374− return err;
6521+ return 0;
63756522 }
63766523
63776524 static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)

Keyboard shortcuts

General

Show keyboard shortcuts
?
Focus the current search
/

Issues and pull requests

Open filters
f

Issues, pull requests and Inbox

Select next item
j↓
Select previous item
k↑
Open selected item
Enter
Dismiss filters or clear selection
Esc

Repository code

Go to file
t