locking/lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache()

Currently, lookup_chain_cache() provides both 'lookup' and 'add' functionalities in a function. However, each is useful. So this patch makes lookup_chain_cache() only do 'lookup' functionality and makes add_chain_cahce() only do 'add' functionality. And it's more readable than before.

Byungchul Park committed 9 years ago

Commit 545c23f1 parent ae813301 file · +93 −48Browse files

Unified · Split

kernel/locking/lockdep.c+93−48

 }
 /*
- * Look up a dependency chain. If the key is not present yet then
+ * Adds a dependency chain into chain hashtable. And must be called with
- * add it and return 1 - in this case the new dependency chain is
+ * graph_lock held.
- * validated. If the key is already hashed, return 0.
+ *
- * (On return with 1 graph_lock is held.)
+ * Return 0 if fail, and graph_lock is released.
+ * Return 1 if succeed, with graph_lock held.
  */
-static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
+static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
-				     struct held_lock *hlock,
+				  struct held_lock *hlock,
-				     u64 chain_key)
+				  u64 chain_key)
 {
 	struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(hlock);
 	struct hlist_head *hash_head = chainhashentry(chain_key);
 	struct lock_chain *chain;
 	int i, j;
+	/*
+	 * Allocate a new chain entry from the static array, and add
+	 * it to the hash:
+	 */
 	/*
 	 * We might need to take the graph lock, ensure we've got IRQs
 	 * disabled to make this an IRQ-safe lock.. for recursion reasons
 	 */
 	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
 		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * We can walk it lock-free, because entries only get added
-	 * to the hash:
-	 */
-	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, hash_head, entry) {
-		if (chain->chain_key == chain_key) {
-cache_hit:
-			debug_atomic_inc(chain_lookup_hits);
-			if (!check_no_collision(curr, hlock, chain))
-				return 0;
-			if (very_verbose(class))
-				printk("\nhash chain already cached, key: "
-					"%016Lx tail class: [%p] %s\n",
-					(unsigned long long)chain_key,
-					class->key, class->name);
-			return 0;
-		}
-	}
-	if (very_verbose(class))
-		printk("\nnew hash chain, key: %016Lx tail class: [%p] %s\n",
-			(unsigned long long)chain_key, class->key, class->name);
-	/*
-	 * Allocate a new chain entry from the static array, and add
-	 * it to the hash:
-	 */
-	if (!graph_lock())
-		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * We have to walk the chain again locked - to avoid duplicates:
-	 */
-	hlist_for_each_entry(chain, hash_head, entry) {
-		if (chain->chain_key == chain_key) {
-			graph_unlock();
-			goto cache_hit;
-		}
-	}
 	if (unlikely(nr_lock_chains >= MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS)) {
 		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
 			return 0;
 	return 1;
 }
+/*
+ * Look up a dependency chain.
+ */
+static inline struct lock_chain *lookup_chain_cache(u64 chain_key)
+{
+	struct hlist_head *hash_head = chainhashentry(chain_key);
+	struct lock_chain *chain;
+	/*
+	 * We can walk it lock-free, because entries only get added
+	 * to the hash:
+	 */
+	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, hash_head, entry) {
+		if (chain->chain_key == chain_key) {
+			debug_atomic_inc(chain_lookup_hits);
+			return chain;
+		}
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+/*
+ * If the key is not present yet in dependency chain cache then
+ * add it and return 1 - in this case the new dependency chain is
+ * validated. If the key is already hashed, return 0.
+ * (On return with 1 graph_lock is held.)
+ */
+static inline int lookup_chain_cache_add(struct task_struct *curr,
+					 struct held_lock *hlock,
+					 u64 chain_key)
+{
+	struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(hlock);
+	struct lock_chain *chain = lookup_chain_cache(chain_key);
+	if (chain) {
+cache_hit:
+		if (!check_no_collision(curr, hlock, chain))
+			return 0;
+		if (very_verbose(class)) {
+			printk("\nhash chain already cached, key: "
+					"%016Lx tail class: [%p] %s\n",
+					(unsigned long long)chain_key,
+					class->key, class->name);
+		}
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if (very_verbose(class)) {
+		printk("\nnew hash chain, key: %016Lx tail class: [%p] %s\n",
+			(unsigned long long)chain_key, class->key, class->name);
+	}
+	if (!graph_lock())
+		return 0;
+	/*
+	 * We have to walk the chain again locked - to avoid duplicates:
+	 */
+	chain = lookup_chain_cache(chain_key);
+	if (chain) {
+		graph_unlock();
+		goto cache_hit;
+	}
+	if (!add_chain_cache(curr, hlock, chain_key))
+		return 0;
+	return 1;
+}
 static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
 		struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
 	 *
 	 * We look up the chain_key and do the O(N^2) check and update of
 	 * the dependencies only if this is a new dependency chain.
-	 * (If lookup_chain_cache() returns with 1 it acquires
+	 * (If lookup_chain_cache_add() return with 1 it acquires
 	 * graph_lock for us)
 	 */
 	if (!hlock->trylock && hlock->check &&
-	    lookup_chain_cache(curr, hlock, chain_key)) {
+	    lookup_chain_cache_add(curr, hlock, chain_key)) {
 		/*
 		 * Check whether last held lock:
 		 *
 		 * Add dependency only if this lock is not the head
 		 * of the chain, and if it's not a secondary read-lock:
 		 */
-		if (!chain_head && ret != 2)
+		if (!chain_head && ret != 2) {
 			if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock))
 				return 0;
+		}
 		graph_unlock();
-	} else
+	} else {
-		/* after lookup_chain_cache(): */
+		/* after lookup_chain_cache_add(): */
 		if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
 			return 0;
+	}
 	return 1;
 }

locking/lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache()

Keyboard shortcuts

General

Issues and pull requests

Issues, pull requests and Inbox

Repository code