History

filemap: Correct the conditions for marking a folio as accessed

We had an off-by-one error which meant that we never marked the first page in a read as accessed. This was visible as a slowdown when re-reading a file as pages were being evicted from cache too soon. In reviewing this code, we noticed a second bug where a multi-page folio would be marked as accessed multiple times when doing reads that were less than the size of the folio. Abstract the comparison of whether two file positions are in the same folio into a new function, fixing both of these bugs.

Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) committed 4 years ago

Commit 5ccc9441 parent 78ca5581 file · +10 −3Browse files

Unified · Split

mm/filemap.c+10−3
@@ -2629,6 +2629,13 @@ err: · 2628 unmodified lines
26292629 return err;
26302630 }
26312631
2632+static inline bool pos_same_folio(loff_t pos1, loff_t pos2, struct folio *folio)
2633+{
2634+ unsigned int shift = folio_shift(folio);
2635+
2636+ return (pos1 >> shift == pos2 >> shift);
2637+}
2638+
26322639 /**
26332640 * filemap_read - Read data from the page cache.
26342641 * @iocb: The iocb to read.
@@ -2700,11 +2707,11 @@ ssize_t filemap_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, · 65 unmodified lines
27002707 writably_mapped = mapping_writably_mapped(mapping);
27012708
27022709 /*
2703− * When a sequential read accesses a page several times, only
2710+ * When a read accesses the same folio several times, only
27042711 * mark it as accessed the first time.
27052712 */
2706− if (iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT !=
2707− ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT)
2713+ if (!pos_same_folio(iocb->ki_pos, ra->prev_pos - 1,
2714+ fbatch.folios[0]))
27082715 folio_mark_accessed(fbatch.folios[0]);
27092716
27102717 for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); i++) {