History

workqueue: async worker destruction

worker destruction includes these parts of code: adjust pool's stats remove the worker from idle list detach the worker from the pool kthread_stop() to wait for the worker's task exit free the worker struct We can find out that there is no essential work to do after kthread_stop(), which means destroy_worker() doesn't need to wait for the worker's task exit, so we can remove kthread_stop() and free the worker struct in the worker exiting path. However, put_unbound_pool() still needs to sync the all the workers' destruction before destroying the pool; otherwise, the workers may access to the invalid pool when they are exiting. So we also move the code of "detach the worker" to the exiting path and let put_unbound_pool() to sync with this code via detach_completion. The code of "detach the worker" is wrapped in a new function "worker_detach_from_pool()" although worker_detach_from_pool() is only called once (in worker_thread()) after this patch, but we need to wrap it for these reasons: 1) The code of "detach the worker" is not short enough to unfold them in worker_thread(). 2) the name of "worker_detach_from_pool()" is self-comment, and we add some comments above the function. 3) it will be shared by rescuer in later patch which allows rescuer and normal thread use the same attach/detach frameworks. The worker id is freed when detaching which happens before the worker is fully dead, but this id of the dying worker may be re-used for a new worker, so the dying worker's task name is changed to "worker/dying" to avoid two or several workers having the same name. Since "detach the worker" is moved out from destroy_worker(), destroy_worker() doesn't require manager_mutex, so the "lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex)" in destroy_worker() is removed, and destroy_worker() is not protected by manager_mutex in put_unbound_pool(). tj: Minor description updates.

Lai Jiangshan committed 12 years ago

Commit 60f5a4b1 parent 73eb7fe1 file · +41 −21Browse files

Unified · Split

kernel/workqueue.c+41−21
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ struct worker_pool { · 162 unmodified lines
163 struct mutex manager_arb; /* manager arbitration */163 struct mutex manager_arb; /* manager arbitration */
164 struct mutex manager_mutex; /* manager exclusion */164 struct mutex manager_mutex; /* manager exclusion */
165 struct idr worker_idr; /* M: worker IDs and iteration */165 struct idr worker_idr; /* M: worker IDs and iteration */
166 struct completion *detach_completion; /* all workers detached */
166 167
167 struct workqueue_attrs *attrs; /* I: worker attributes */168 struct workqueue_attrs *attrs; /* I: worker attributes */
168 struct hlist_node hash_node; /* PL: unbound_pool_hash node */169 struct hlist_node hash_node; /* PL: unbound_pool_hash node */
@@ -1687,6 +1688,30 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void) · 1518 unmodified lines
1687 return worker;1688 return worker;
1688}1689}
1689 1690
1691/**
1692 * worker_detach_from_pool() - detach a worker from its pool
1693 * @worker: worker which is attached to its pool
1694 * @pool: the pool @worker is attached to
1695 *
1696 * Undo the attaching which had been done in create_worker(). The caller
1697 * worker shouldn't access to the pool after detached except it has other
1698 * reference to the pool.
1699 */
1700static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker,
1701 struct worker_pool *pool)
1702{
1703 struct completion *detach_completion = NULL;
1704
1705 mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
1706 idr_remove(&pool->worker_idr, worker->id);
1707 if (idr_is_empty(&pool->worker_idr))
1708 detach_completion = pool->detach_completion;
1709 mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
1710
1711 if (detach_completion)
1712 complete(detach_completion);
1713}
1714
1690/**1715/**
1691 * create_worker - create a new workqueue worker1716 * create_worker - create a new workqueue worker
1692 * @pool: pool the new worker will belong to1717 * @pool: pool the new worker will belong to
@@ -1815,13 +1840,12 @@ static int create_and_start_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) · 122 unmodified lines
1815 * be idle.1840 * be idle.
1816 *1841 *
1817 * CONTEXT:1842 * CONTEXT:
1818 * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) which is released and regrabbed.1843 * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
1819 */1844 */
1820static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)1845static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
1821{1846{
1822 struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;1847 struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
1823 1848
1824 lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
1825 lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock);1849 lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock);
1826 1850
1827 /* sanity check frenzy */1851 /* sanity check frenzy */
@@ -1833,24 +1857,9 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker) · 5 unmodified lines
1833 pool->nr_workers--;1857 pool->nr_workers--;
1834 pool->nr_idle--;1858 pool->nr_idle--;
1835 1859
1836 /*
1837 * Once WORKER_DIE is set, the kworker may destroy itself at any
1838 * point. Pin to ensure the task stays until we're done with it.
1839 */
1840 get_task_struct(worker->task);
1841
1842 list_del_init(&worker->entry);1860 list_del_init(&worker->entry);
1843 worker->flags |= WORKER_DIE;1861 worker->flags |= WORKER_DIE;
1844 1862 wake_up_process(worker->task);
1845 idr_remove(&pool->worker_idr, worker->id);
1846
1847 spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
1848
1849 kthread_stop(worker->task);
1850 put_task_struct(worker->task);
1851 kfree(worker);
1852
1853 spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
1854}1863}
1855 1864
1856static void idle_worker_timeout(unsigned long __pool)1865static void idle_worker_timeout(unsigned long __pool)
@@ -2289,6 +2298,10 @@ woke_up: · 432 unmodified lines
2289 spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);2298 spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
2290 WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&worker->entry));2299 WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&worker->entry));
2291 worker->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER;2300 worker->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER;
2301
2302 set_task_comm(worker->task, "kworker/dying");
2303 worker_detach_from_pool(worker, pool);
2304 kfree(worker);
2292 return 0;2305 return 0;
2293 }2306 }
2294 2307
@@ -3560,6 +3573,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu) · 1265 unmodified lines
3560 */3573 */
3561static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)3574static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
3562{3575{
3576 DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(detach_completion);
3563 struct worker *worker;3577 struct worker *worker;
3564 3578
3565 lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);3579 lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
@@ -3583,15 +3597,21 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) · 17 unmodified lines
3583 * manager_mutex.3597 * manager_mutex.
3584 */3598 */
3585 mutex_lock(&pool->manager_arb);3599 mutex_lock(&pool->manager_arb);
3586 mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
3587 spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
3588 3600
3601 spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
3589 while ((worker = first_worker(pool)))3602 while ((worker = first_worker(pool)))
3590 destroy_worker(worker);3603 destroy_worker(worker);
3591 WARN_ON(pool->nr_workers || pool->nr_idle);3604 WARN_ON(pool->nr_workers || pool->nr_idle);
3592
3593 spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);3605 spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
3606
3607 mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
3608 if (!idr_is_empty(&pool->worker_idr))
3609 pool->detach_completion = &detach_completion;
3594 mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);3610 mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
3611
3612 if (pool->detach_completion)
3613 wait_for_completion(pool->detach_completion);
3614
3595 mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_arb);3615 mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_arb);
3596 3616
3597 /* shut down the timers */3617 /* shut down the timers */