Fix two issues: When called for PTRACE_TRACEME, ptrace_link() would obtain an RCU reference to the parent's objective credentials, then give that pointer to get_cred(). However, the object lifetime rules for things like struct cred do not permit unconditionally turning an RCU reference into a stable reference. PTRACE_TRACEME records the parent's credentials as if the parent was acting as the subject, but that's not the case. If a malicious unprivileged child uses PTRACE_TRACEME and the parent is privileged, and at a later point, the parent process becomes attacker-controlled (because it drops privileges and calls execve()), the attacker ends up with control over two processes with a privileged ptrace relationship, which can be abused to ptrace a suid binary and obtain root privileges. Fix both of these by always recording the credentials of the process that is requesting the creation of the ptrace relationship: current_cred() can't change under us, and current is the proper subject for access control. This change is theoretically userspace-visible, but I am not aware of any code that it will actually break.
Unified · Split
| @@ -79,9 +79,7 @@ void __ptrace_link(struct task_struct *child, struct task_struct *new_parent, · 78 unmodified lines | ||
| 79 | 79 | */ |
| 80 | 80 | static void ptrace_link(struct task_struct *child, struct task_struct *new_parent) |
| 81 | 81 | { |
| 82 | − rcu_read_lock(); | |
| 83 | − __ptrace_link(child, new_parent, __task_cred(new_parent)); | |
| 84 | − rcu_read_unlock(); | |
| 82 | + __ptrace_link(child, new_parent, current_cred()); | |
| 85 | 83 | } |
| 86 | 84 | |
| 87 | 85 | /** |