History

page_alloc: fix invalid watermark check on a negative value

There was a report that a task is waiting at the throttle_direct_reclaim. The pgscan_direct_throttle in vmstat was increasing. This is a bug where zone_watermark_fast returns true even when the free is very low. The commit f27ce0e14088 ("page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast") changed the watermark fast to consider highatomic reserve. But it did not handle a negative value case which can be happened when reserved_highatomic pageblock is bigger than the actual free. If watermark is considered as ok for the negative value, allocating contexts for order-0 will consume all free pages without direct reclaim, and finally free page may become depleted except highatomic free. Then allocating contexts may fall into throttle_direct_reclaim. This symptom may easily happen in a system where wmark min is low and other reclaimers like kswapd does not make free pages quickly. Handle the negative case by using MIN.

Jaewon Kim committed 4 years ago

Commit 92820121 parent 1f7ea541 file · +8 −4Browse files

Unified · Split

mm/page_alloc.c+8−4
@@ -3968,11 +3968,15 @@ static inline bool zone_watermark_fast(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, · 3967 unmodified lines
3968 * need to be calculated.3968 * need to be calculated.
3969 */3969 */
3970 if (!order) {3970 if (!order) {
3971 long fast_free;3971 long usable_free;
3972 long reserved;
3972 3973
3973 fast_free = free_pages;3974 usable_free = free_pages;
3974 fast_free -= __zone_watermark_unusable_free(z, 0, alloc_flags);3975 reserved = __zone_watermark_unusable_free(z, 0, alloc_flags);
3975 if (fast_free > mark + z->lowmem_reserve[highest_zoneidx])3976
3977 /* reserved may over estimate high-atomic reserves. */
3978 usable_free -= min(usable_free, reserved);
3979 if (usable_free > mark + z->lowmem_reserve[highest_zoneidx])
3976 return true;3980 return true;
3977 }3981 }
3978 3982