History

sched/core: Optimize try_to_wake_up() for local wakeups

Jens reported that significant performance can be had on some block workloads by special casing local wakeups. That is, wakeups on the current task before it schedules out. Given something like the normal wait pattern: for (;;) { set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); if (cond) break; schedule(); } __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); Any wakeup (on this CPU) after set_current_state() and before schedule() would benefit from this. Normal wakeups take p->pi_lock, which serializes wakeups to the same task. By eliding that we gain concurrency on: - ttwu_stat(); we already had concurrency on rq stats, this now also brings it to task stats. -ENOCARE - tracepoints; it is now possible to get multiple instances of trace_sched_waking() (and possibly trace_sched_wakeup()) for the same task. Tracers will have to learn to cope. Furthermore, p->pi_lock is used by set_special_state(), to order against TASK_RUNNING stores from other CPUs. But since this is strictly CPU local, we don't need the lock, and set_special_state()'s disabling of IRQs is sufficient. After the normal wakeup takes p->pi_lock it issues smp_mb__after_spinlock(), in order to ensure the woken task must observe prior stores before we observe the p->state. If this is CPU local, this will be satisfied with a compiler barrier, and we rely on try_to_wake_up() being a funcation call, which implies such. Since, when 'p == current', 'p->on_rq' must be true, the normal wakeup would continue into the ttwu_remote() branch, which normally is concerned with exactly this wakeup scenario, except from a remote CPU. IOW we're waking a task that is still running. In this case, we can trivially avoid taking rq->lock, all that's left from this is to set p->state. This then yields an extremely simple and fast path for 'p == current'.

Peter Zijlstra committed 7 years ago

Commit aacedf21 parent 509466b1 file · +29 −5Browse files

Unified · Split

kernel/sched/core.c+29−5
@@ -1991,6 +1991,29 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) · 1990 unmodified lines
19911991 unsigned long flags;
19921992 int cpu, success = 0;
19931993
1994+ if (p == current) {
1995+ /*
1996+ * We're waking current, this means 'p->on_rq' and 'task_cpu(p)
1997+ * == smp_processor_id()'. Together this means we can special
1998+ * case the whole 'p->on_rq && ttwu_remote()' case below
1999+ * without taking any locks.
2000+ *
2001+ * In particular:
2002+ * - we rely on Program-Order guarantees for all the ordering,
2003+ * - we're serialized against set_special_state() by virtue of
2004+ * it disabling IRQs (this allows not taking ->pi_lock).
2005+ */
2006+ if (!(p->state & state))
2007+ return false;
2008+
2009+ success = 1;
2010+ cpu = task_cpu(p);
2011+ trace_sched_waking(p);
2012+ p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
2013+ trace_sched_wakeup(p);
2014+ goto out;
2015+ }
2016+
19942017 /*
19952018 * If we are going to wake up a thread waiting for CONDITION we
19962019 * need to ensure that CONDITION=1 done by the caller can not be
@@ -2000,7 +2023,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) · 3 unmodified lines
20002023 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
20012024 smp_mb__after_spinlock();
20022025 if (!(p->state & state))
2003− goto out;
2026+ goto unlock;
20042027
20052028 trace_sched_waking(p);
20062029
@@ -2030,7 +2053,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) · 23 unmodified lines
20302053 */
20312054 smp_rmb();
20322055 if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
2033− goto stat;
2056+ goto unlock;
20342057
20352058 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
20362059 /*
@@ -2090,10 +2113,11 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) · 53 unmodified lines
20902113 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
20912114
20922115 ttwu_queue(p, cpu, wake_flags);
2093−stat:
2094− ttwu_stat(p, cpu, wake_flags);
2095−out:
2116+unlock:
20962117 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
2118+out:
2119+ if (success)
2120+ ttwu_stat(p, cpu, wake_flags);
20972121
20982122 return success;
20992123 }

Keyboard shortcuts

General

Show keyboard shortcuts
?
Focus the current search
/

Issues and pull requests

Open filters
f

Issues, pull requests and Inbox

Select next item
j↓
Select previous item
k↑
Open selected item
Enter
Dismiss filters or clear selection
Esc

Repository code

Go to file
t