History

PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is always present

An implementation of suspend_ops is allowed to reject the PM_SUSPEND_MEM suspend type from its ->valid() callback, we should not assume that it is always present as this is not a correct reflection of what a firmware interface may support.

Florian Fainelli committed 5 years ago

Commit bfcc1e61 parent 6880fa61 file · +2 −2Browse files

Unified · Split

kernel/power/suspend.c+2−2
@@ -171,8 +171,7 @@ static bool valid_state(suspend_state_t state) · 170 unmodified lines
171 171
172void __init pm_states_init(void)172void __init pm_states_init(void)
173{173{
174 /* "mem" and "freeze" are always present in /sys/power/state. */174 /* "freeze" is always present in /sys/power/state. */
175 pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM];
176 pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE];175 pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE];
177 /*176 /*
178 * Suspend-to-idle should be supported even without any suspend_ops,177 * Suspend-to-idle should be supported even without any suspend_ops,
@@ -214,6 +213,7 @@ void suspend_set_ops(const struct platform_suspend_ops *ops) · 35 unmodified lines
214 }213 }
215 if (valid_state(PM_SUSPEND_MEM)) {214 if (valid_state(PM_SUSPEND_MEM)) {
216 mem_sleep_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = mem_sleep_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM];215 mem_sleep_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = mem_sleep_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM];
216 pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM];
217 if (mem_sleep_default >= PM_SUSPEND_MEM)217 if (mem_sleep_default >= PM_SUSPEND_MEM)
218 mem_sleep_current = PM_SUSPEND_MEM;218 mem_sleep_current = PM_SUSPEND_MEM;
219 }219 }