History

bpf: Remove config check to enable bpf support for branch records

Branch data available to BPF programs can be very useful to get stack traces out of userspace application. Commit fff7b64355ea ("bpf: Add bpf_read_branch_records() helper") added BPF support to capture branch records in x86. Enable this feature also for other architectures as well by removing checks specific to x86. If an architecture doesn't support branch records, bpf_read_branch_records() still has appropriate checks and it will return an -EINVAL in that scenario. Based on UAPI helper doc in include/uapi/linux/bpf.h, unsupported architectures should return -ENOENT in such case. Hence, update the appropriate check to return -ENOENT instead. Selftest 'perf_branches' result on power9 machine which has the branch stacks support: - Before this patch: [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:FAIL #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK #88 perf_branches:FAIL Summary: 0/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED - After this patch: [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:OK #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK #88 perf_branches:OK Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Selftest 'perf_branches' result on power9 machine which doesn't have branch stack report: - After this patch: [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:SKIP #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK #88 perf_branches:OK Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Kajol Jain committed 4 years ago

Commit db52f571 parent 942df4d1 file · +1 −5Browse files

Unified · Split

kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c+1−5
@@ -1404,9 +1404,6 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_prog_read_value_proto = { · 1403 unmodified lines
14041404 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_read_branch_records, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
14051405 void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags)
14061406 {
1407−#ifndef CONFIG_X86
1408− return -ENOENT;
1409−#else
14101407 static const u32 br_entry_size = sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
14111408 struct perf_branch_stack *br_stack = ctx->data->br_stack;
14121409 u32 to_copy;
@@ -1415,7 +1412,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_read_branch_records, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx, · 2 unmodified lines
14151412 return -EINVAL;
14161413
14171414 if (unlikely(!br_stack))
1418− return -EINVAL;
1415+ return -ENOENT;
14191416
14201417 if (flags & BPF_F_GET_BRANCH_RECORDS_SIZE)
14211418 return br_stack->nr * br_entry_size;
@@ -1427,7 +1424,6 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_read_branch_records, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx, · 5 unmodified lines
14271424 memcpy(buf, br_stack->entries, to_copy);
14281425
14291426 return to_copy;
1430−#endif
14311427 }
14321428
14331429 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_read_branch_records_proto = {