bpf: Avoid old-style declaration warnings

gcc -Wextra wants type modifiers in the normal order: kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c:70:1: error: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration] 70 | const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = { | ^~~~~ kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c:91:1: error: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration] 91 | const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = { | ^~~~~

Arnd Bergmann committed 5 years ago

Commit e2c69f31 parent 78b226d1 file · +2 −2Browse files

Unified · Split

kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c+2−2

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_bprm_opts_set, struct linux_binprm *, bprm, u64, flags) · 66 unmodified lines
67	67
68	68	BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_bprm_opts_set_btf_ids, struct, linux_binprm)
69	69
70		−const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
	70	+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
71	71	.func = bpf_bprm_opts_set,
72	72	.gpl_only = false,
73	73	.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static bool bpf_ima_inode_hash_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog) · 14 unmodified lines
88	88
89	89	BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_ima_inode_hash_btf_ids, struct, inode)
90	90
91		−const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = {
	91	+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = {
92	92	.func = bpf_ima_inode_hash,
93	93	.gpl_only = false,
94	94	.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,

bpf: Avoid old-style declaration warnings

Keyboard shortcuts

General

Issues and pull requests

Issues, pull requests and Inbox

Repository code