History

percpu_counter: add percpu_counter_sum_all interface

The percpu_counter is used for scenarios where performance is more important than the accuracy. For percpu_counter users, who want more accurate information in their slowpath, percpu_counter_sum is provided which traverses all the online CPUs to accumulate the data. The reason it only needs to traverse online CPUs is because percpu_counter does implement CPU offline callback which syncs the local data of the offlined CPU. However there is a small race window between the online CPUs traversal of percpu_counter_sum and the CPU offline callback. The offline callback has to traverse all the percpu_counters on the system to flush the CPU local data which can be a lot. During that time, the CPU which is going offline has already been published as offline to all the readers. So, as the offline callback is running, percpu_counter_sum can be called for one counter which has some state on the CPU going offline. Since percpu_counter_sum only traverses online CPUs, it will skip that specific CPU and the offline callback might not have flushed the state for that specific percpu_counter on that offlined CPU. Normally this is not an issue because percpu_counter users can deal with some inaccuracy for small time window. However a new user i.e. mm_struct on the cleanup path wants to check the exact state of the percpu_counter through check_mm(). For such users, this patch introduces percpu_counter_sum_all() which traverses all possible CPUs and it is used in fork.c:check_mm() to avoid the potential race. This issue is exposed by the later patch "mm: convert mm's rss stats into percpu_counter".

Shakeel Butt committed 4 years ago

Commit f6890541 parent f1a79413 files · +34 −6Browse files

Showing the changes to lib (1 of 3 files). Show all

Unified · Split

lib/percpu_counter.c+23−6
@@ -117,11 +117,8 @@ void percpu_counter_sync(struct percpu_counter *fbc) · 116 unmodified lines
117117 }
118118 EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_sync);
119119
120−/*
121− * Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result. This is a more accurate
122− * but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive()
123− */
124−s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
120+static s64 __percpu_counter_sum_mask(struct percpu_counter *fbc,
121+ const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
125122 {
126123 s64 ret;
127124 int cpu;
@@ -129,15 +126,35 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc) · 1 unmodified line
129126
130127 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
131128 ret = fbc->count;
132− for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
129+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_mask) {
133130 s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
134131 ret += *pcount;
135132 }
136133 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
137134 return ret;
138135 }
136+
137+/*
138+ * Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result. This is a more accurate
139+ * but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive()
140+ */
141+s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
142+{
143+ return __percpu_counter_sum_mask(fbc, cpu_online_mask);
144+}
139145 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_sum);
140146
147+/*
148+ * This is slower version of percpu_counter_sum as it traverses all possible
149+ * cpus. Use this only in the cases where accurate data is needed in the
150+ * presense of CPUs getting offlined.
151+ */
152+s64 percpu_counter_sum_all(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
153+{
154+ return __percpu_counter_sum_mask(fbc, cpu_possible_mask);
155+}
156+EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_sum_all);
157+
141158 int __percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, gfp_t gfp,
142159 struct lock_class_key *key)
143160 {

Keyboard shortcuts

General

Show keyboard shortcuts
?
Focus the current search
/

Issues and pull requests

Open filters
f

Issues, pull requests and Inbox

Select next item
j↓
Select previous item
k↑
Open selected item
Enter
Dismiss filters or clear selection
Esc

Repository code

Go to file
t