Make intel_pstate take the new CPUFREQ_GOV_STRICT_TARGET governor flag into account when it operates in the passive mode with HWP enabled, so as to fix the "powersave" governor behavior in that case (currently, HWP is allowed to scale the performance all the way up to the policy max limit when the "powersave" governor is used, but it should be constrained to the policy min limit then).
Unified · Split
| @@ -2527,7 +2527,7 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_trace(struct cpudata *cpu, unsigned int trace_type, in · 2526 unmodified lines | ||
| 2527 | 2527 | } |
| 2528 | 2528 | |
| 2529 | 2529 | static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(struct cpudata *cpu, u32 target_pstate, |
| 2530 | − bool fast_switch) | |
| 2530 | + bool strict, bool fast_switch) | |
| 2531 | 2531 | { |
| 2532 | 2532 | u64 prev = READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached), value = prev; |
| 2533 | 2533 | |
| @@ -2539,7 +2539,7 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(struct cpudata *cpu, u32 target_pstate, · 5 unmodified lines | ||
| 2539 | 2539 | * field in it, so opportunistically update the max too if needed. |
| 2540 | 2540 | */ |
| 2541 | 2541 | value &= ~HWP_MAX_PERF(~0L); |
| 2542 | − value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(cpu->max_perf_ratio); | |
| 2542 | + value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(strict ? target_pstate : cpu->max_perf_ratio); | |
| 2543 | 2543 | |
| 2544 | 2544 | if (value == prev) |
| 2545 | 2545 | return; |
| @@ -2562,14 +2562,16 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ctl(struct cpudata *cpu, · 16 unmodified lines | ||
| 2562 | 2562 | pstate_funcs.get_val(cpu, target_pstate)); |
| 2563 | 2563 | } |
| 2564 | 2564 | |
| 2565 | −static int intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int target_pstate, | |
| 2566 | − bool fast_switch) | |
| 2565 | +static int intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, | |
| 2566 | + int target_pstate, bool fast_switch) | |
| 2567 | 2567 | { |
| 2568 | + struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; | |
| 2568 | 2569 | int old_pstate = cpu->pstate.current_pstate; |
| 2569 | 2570 | |
| 2570 | 2571 | target_pstate = intel_pstate_prepare_request(cpu, target_pstate); |
| 2571 | 2572 | if (hwp_active) { |
| 2572 | − intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(cpu, target_pstate, fast_switch); | |
| 2573 | + intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(cpu, target_pstate, | |
| 2574 | + policy->strict_target, fast_switch); | |
| 2573 | 2575 | cpu->pstate.current_pstate = target_pstate; |
| 2574 | 2576 | } else if (target_pstate != old_pstate) { |
| 2575 | 2577 | intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ctl(cpu, target_pstate, fast_switch); |
| @@ -2609,7 +2611,7 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, · 33 unmodified lines | ||
| 2609 | 2611 | break; |
| 2610 | 2612 | } |
| 2611 | 2613 | |
| 2612 | − target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(cpu, target_pstate, false); | |
| 2614 | + target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(policy, target_pstate, false); | |
| 2613 | 2615 | |
| 2614 | 2616 | freqs.new = target_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; |
| 2615 | 2617 | |
| @@ -2628,7 +2630,7 @@ static unsigned int intel_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, · 12 unmodified lines | ||
| 2628 | 2630 | |
| 2629 | 2631 | target_pstate = DIV_ROUND_UP(target_freq, cpu->pstate.scaling); |
| 2630 | 2632 | |
| 2631 | − target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(cpu, target_pstate, true); | |
| 2633 | + target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(policy, target_pstate, true); | |
| 2632 | 2634 | |
| 2633 | 2635 | return target_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; |
| 2634 | 2636 | } |