History

My first initial commit with all of mine experimental changes.

Dmitry Kabak (userdima committed 13 years ago

Commit d37b88d1 parent 3f5b46618352 files · +2598093 −-8690Browse files

Showing the changes to java/pkg/java/util/Comparator.java (1 of 18352 files). Show all

Unified · Split

java/pkg/java/util/Comparator.java+168−0
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
1+/*
2+ * Copyright (c) 1997, 2007, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
3+ * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
4+ *
5+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
6+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
7+ * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this
8+ * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
9+ * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
10+ *
11+ * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
12+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
13+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
14+ * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
15+ * accompanied this code).
16+ *
17+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
18+ * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
19+ * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
20+ *
21+ * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
22+ * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
23+ * questions.
24+ */
25+
26+package java.util;
27+
28+/**
29+ * A comparison function, which imposes a <i>total ordering</i> on some
30+ * collection of objects. Comparators can be passed to a sort method (such
31+ * as {@link Collections#sort(List,Comparator) Collections.sort} or {@link
32+ * Arrays#sort(Object[],Comparator) Arrays.sort}) to allow precise control
33+ * over the sort order. Comparators can also be used to control the order of
34+ * certain data structures (such as {@link SortedSet sorted sets} or {@link
35+ * SortedMap sorted maps}), or to provide an ordering for collections of
36+ * objects that don't have a {@link Comparable natural ordering}.<p>
37+ *
38+ * The ordering imposed by a comparator <tt>c</tt> on a set of elements
39+ * <tt>S</tt> is said to be <i>consistent with equals</i> if and only if
40+ * <tt>c.compare(e1, e2)==0</tt> has the same boolean value as
41+ * <tt>e1.equals(e2)</tt> for every <tt>e1</tt> and <tt>e2</tt> in
42+ * <tt>S</tt>.<p>
43+ *
44+ * Caution should be exercised when using a comparator capable of imposing an
45+ * ordering inconsistent with equals to order a sorted set (or sorted map).
46+ * Suppose a sorted set (or sorted map) with an explicit comparator <tt>c</tt>
47+ * is used with elements (or keys) drawn from a set <tt>S</tt>. If the
48+ * ordering imposed by <tt>c</tt> on <tt>S</tt> is inconsistent with equals,
49+ * the sorted set (or sorted map) will behave "strangely." In particular the
50+ * sorted set (or sorted map) will violate the general contract for set (or
51+ * map), which is defined in terms of <tt>equals</tt>.<p>
52+ *
53+ * For example, suppose one adds two elements {@code a} and {@code b} such that
54+ * {@code (a.equals(b) && c.compare(a, b) != 0)}
55+ * to an empty {@code TreeSet} with comparator {@code c}.
56+ * The second {@code add} operation will return
57+ * true (and the size of the tree set will increase) because {@code a} and
58+ * {@code b} are not equivalent from the tree set's perspective, even though
59+ * this is contrary to the specification of the
60+ * {@link Set#add Set.add} method.<p>
61+ *
62+ * Note: It is generally a good idea for comparators to also implement
63+ * <tt>java.io.Serializable</tt>, as they may be used as ordering methods in
64+ * serializable data structures (like {@link TreeSet}, {@link TreeMap}). In
65+ * order for the data structure to serialize successfully, the comparator (if
66+ * provided) must implement <tt>Serializable</tt>.<p>
67+ *
68+ * For the mathematically inclined, the <i>relation</i> that defines the
69+ * <i>imposed ordering</i> that a given comparator <tt>c</tt> imposes on a
70+ * given set of objects <tt>S</tt> is:<pre>
71+ * {(x, y) such that c.compare(x, y) &lt;= 0}.
72+ * </pre> The <i>quotient</i> for this total order is:<pre>
73+ * {(x, y) such that c.compare(x, y) == 0}.
74+ * </pre>
75+ *
76+ * It follows immediately from the contract for <tt>compare</tt> that the
77+ * quotient is an <i>equivalence relation</i> on <tt>S</tt>, and that the
78+ * imposed ordering is a <i>total order</i> on <tt>S</tt>. When we say that
79+ * the ordering imposed by <tt>c</tt> on <tt>S</tt> is <i>consistent with
80+ * equals</i>, we mean that the quotient for the ordering is the equivalence
81+ * relation defined by the objects' {@link Object#equals(Object)
82+ * equals(Object)} method(s):<pre>
83+ * {(x, y) such that x.equals(y)}. </pre>
84+ *
85+ * <p>Unlike {@code Comparable}, a comparator may optionally permit
86+ * comparison of null arguments, while maintaining the requirements for
87+ * an equivalence relation.
88+ *
89+ * <p>This interface is a member of the
90+ * <a href="{@docRoot}/../technotes/guides/collections/index.html">
91+ * Java Collections Framework</a>.
92+ *
93+ * @param <T> the type of objects that may be compared by this comparator
94+ *
95+ * @author Josh Bloch
96+ * @author Neal Gafter
97+ * @see Comparable
98+ * @see java.io.Serializable
99+ * @since 1.2
100+ */
101+
102+public interface Comparator<T> {
103+ /**
104+ * Compares its two arguments for order. Returns a negative integer,
105+ * zero, or a positive integer as the first argument is less than, equal
106+ * to, or greater than the second.<p>
107+ *
108+ * In the foregoing description, the notation
109+ * <tt>sgn(</tt><i>expression</i><tt>)</tt> designates the mathematical
110+ * <i>signum</i> function, which is defined to return one of <tt>-1</tt>,
111+ * <tt>0</tt>, or <tt>1</tt> according to whether the value of
112+ * <i>expression</i> is negative, zero or positive.<p>
113+ *
114+ * The implementor must ensure that <tt>sgn(compare(x, y)) ==
115+ * -sgn(compare(y, x))</tt> for all <tt>x</tt> and <tt>y</tt>. (This
116+ * implies that <tt>compare(x, y)</tt> must throw an exception if and only
117+ * if <tt>compare(y, x)</tt> throws an exception.)<p>
118+ *
119+ * The implementor must also ensure that the relation is transitive:
120+ * <tt>((compare(x, y)&gt;0) &amp;&amp; (compare(y, z)&gt;0))</tt> implies
121+ * <tt>compare(x, z)&gt;0</tt>.<p>
122+ *
123+ * Finally, the implementor must ensure that <tt>compare(x, y)==0</tt>
124+ * implies that <tt>sgn(compare(x, z))==sgn(compare(y, z))</tt> for all
125+ * <tt>z</tt>.<p>
126+ *
127+ * It is generally the case, but <i>not</i> strictly required that
128+ * <tt>(compare(x, y)==0) == (x.equals(y))</tt>. Generally speaking,
129+ * any comparator that violates this condition should clearly indicate
130+ * this fact. The recommended language is "Note: this comparator
131+ * imposes orderings that are inconsistent with equals."
132+ *
133+ * @param o1 the first object to be compared.
134+ * @param o2 the second object to be compared.
135+ * @return a negative integer, zero, or a positive integer as the
136+ * first argument is less than, equal to, or greater than the
137+ * second.
138+ * @throws NullPointerException if an argument is null and this
139+ * comparator does not permit null arguments
140+ * @throws ClassCastException if the arguments' types prevent them from
141+ * being compared by this comparator.
142+ */
143+ int compare(T o1, T o2);
144+
145+ /**
146+ * Indicates whether some other object is &quot;equal to&quot; this
147+ * comparator. This method must obey the general contract of
148+ * {@link Object#equals(Object)}. Additionally, this method can return
149+ * <tt>true</tt> <i>only</i> if the specified object is also a comparator
150+ * and it imposes the same ordering as this comparator. Thus,
151+ * <code>comp1.equals(comp2)</code> implies that <tt>sgn(comp1.compare(o1,
152+ * o2))==sgn(comp2.compare(o1, o2))</tt> for every object reference
153+ * <tt>o1</tt> and <tt>o2</tt>.<p>
154+ *
155+ * Note that it is <i>always</i> safe <i>not</i> to override
156+ * <tt>Object.equals(Object)</tt>. However, overriding this method may,
157+ * in some cases, improve performance by allowing programs to determine
158+ * that two distinct comparators impose the same order.
159+ *
160+ * @param obj the reference object with which to compare.
161+ * @return <code>true</code> only if the specified object is also
162+ * a comparator and it imposes the same ordering as this
163+ * comparator.
164+ * @see Object#equals(Object)
165+ * @see Object#hashCode()
166+ */
167+ boolean equals(Object obj);
168+}