Showing the changes to java/pkg/java/security/AccessControlContext.java (1 of 18352 files). Show all
Unified · Split
| @@ -0,0 +1,598 @@ | ||
| 1 | +/* | |
| 2 | + * Copyright (c) 1997, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | |
| 3 | + * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. | |
| 4 | + * | |
| 5 | + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it | |
| 6 | + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as | |
| 7 | + * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this | |
| 8 | + * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided | |
| 9 | + * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code. | |
| 10 | + * | |
| 11 | + * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT | |
| 12 | + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or | |
| 13 | + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License | |
| 14 | + * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that | |
| 15 | + * accompanied this code). | |
| 16 | + * | |
| 17 | + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version | |
| 18 | + * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, | |
| 19 | + * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. | |
| 20 | + * | |
| 21 | + * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA | |
| 22 | + * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any | |
| 23 | + * questions. | |
| 24 | + */ | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | +package java.security; | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | +import java.util.ArrayList; | |
| 29 | +import java.util.List; | |
| 30 | +import sun.security.util.Debug; | |
| 31 | +import sun.security.util.SecurityConstants; | |
| 32 | +import sun.misc.JavaSecurityAccess; | |
| 33 | +import sun.misc.SharedSecrets; | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
| 36 | +/** | |
| 37 | + * An AccessControlContext is used to make system resource access decisions | |
| 38 | + * based on the context it encapsulates. | |
| 39 | + * | |
| 40 | + * <p>More specifically, it encapsulates a context and | |
| 41 | + * has a single method, <code>checkPermission</code>, | |
| 42 | + * that is equivalent to the <code>checkPermission</code> method | |
| 43 | + * in the AccessController class, with one difference: The AccessControlContext | |
| 44 | + * <code>checkPermission</code> method makes access decisions based on the | |
| 45 | + * context it encapsulates, | |
| 46 | + * rather than that of the current execution thread. | |
| 47 | + * | |
| 48 | + * <p>Thus, the purpose of AccessControlContext is for those situations where | |
| 49 | + * a security check that should be made within a given context | |
| 50 | + * actually needs to be done from within a | |
| 51 | + * <i>different</i> context (for example, from within a worker thread). | |
| 52 | + * | |
| 53 | + * <p> An AccessControlContext is created by calling the | |
| 54 | + * <code>AccessController.getContext</code> method. | |
| 55 | + * The <code>getContext</code> method takes a "snapshot" | |
| 56 | + * of the current calling context, and places | |
| 57 | + * it in an AccessControlContext object, which it returns. A sample call is | |
| 58 | + * the following: | |
| 59 | + * | |
| 60 | + * <pre> | |
| 61 | + * AccessControlContext acc = AccessController.getContext() | |
| 62 | + * </pre> | |
| 63 | + * | |
| 64 | + * <p> | |
| 65 | + * Code within a different context can subsequently call the | |
| 66 | + * <code>checkPermission</code> method on the | |
| 67 | + * previously-saved AccessControlContext object. A sample call is the | |
| 68 | + * following: | |
| 69 | + * | |
| 70 | + * <pre> | |
| 71 | + * acc.checkPermission(permission) | |
| 72 | + * </pre> | |
| 73 | + * | |
| 74 | + * @see AccessController | |
| 75 | + * | |
| 76 | + * @author Roland Schemers | |
| 77 | + */ | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | +public final class AccessControlContext { | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + private ProtectionDomain context[]; | |
| 82 | + private boolean isPrivileged; | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + // Note: This field is directly used by the virtual machine | |
| 85 | + // native codes. Don't touch it. | |
| 86 | + private AccessControlContext privilegedContext; | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + private DomainCombiner combiner = null; | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + private static boolean debugInit = false; | |
| 91 | + private static Debug debug = null; | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + static Debug getDebug() | |
| 94 | + { | |
| 95 | + if (debugInit) | |
| 96 | + return debug; | |
| 97 | + else { | |
| 98 | + if (Policy.isSet()) { | |
| 99 | + debug = Debug.getInstance("access"); | |
| 100 | + debugInit = true; | |
| 101 | + } | |
| 102 | + return debug; | |
| 103 | + } | |
| 104 | + } | |
| 105 | + | |
| 106 | + /** | |
| 107 | + * Create an AccessControlContext with the given array of ProtectionDomains. | |
| 108 | + * Context must not be null. Duplicate domains will be removed from the | |
| 109 | + * context. | |
| 110 | + * | |
| 111 | + * @param context the ProtectionDomains associated with this context. | |
| 112 | + * The non-duplicate domains are copied from the array. Subsequent | |
| 113 | + * changes to the array will not affect this AccessControlContext. | |
| 114 | + * @throws NullPointerException if <code>context</code> is <code>null</code> | |
| 115 | + */ | |
| 116 | + public AccessControlContext(ProtectionDomain context[]) | |
| 117 | + { | |
| 118 | + if (context.length == 0) { | |
| 119 | + this.context = null; | |
| 120 | + } else if (context.length == 1) { | |
| 121 | + if (context[0] != null) { | |
| 122 | + this.context = context.clone(); | |
| 123 | + } else { | |
| 124 | + this.context = null; | |
| 125 | + } | |
| 126 | + } else { | |
| 127 | + List<ProtectionDomain> v = new ArrayList<>(context.length); | |
| 128 | + for (int i =0; i< context.length; i++) { | |
| 129 | + if ((context[i] != null) && (!v.contains(context[i]))) | |
| 130 | + v.add(context[i]); | |
| 131 | + } | |
| 132 | + if (!v.isEmpty()) { | |
| 133 | + this.context = new ProtectionDomain[v.size()]; | |
| 134 | + this.context = v.toArray(this.context); | |
| 135 | + } | |
| 136 | + } | |
| 137 | + } | |
| 138 | + | |
| 139 | + /** | |
| 140 | + * Create a new <code>AccessControlContext</code> with the given | |
| 141 | + * <code>AccessControlContext</code> and <code>DomainCombiner</code>. | |
| 142 | + * This constructor associates the provided | |
| 143 | + * <code>DomainCombiner</code> with the provided | |
| 144 | + * <code>AccessControlContext</code>. | |
| 145 | + * | |
| 146 | + * <p> | |
| 147 | + * | |
| 148 | + * @param acc the <code>AccessControlContext</code> associated | |
| 149 | + * with the provided <code>DomainCombiner</code>. | |
| 150 | + * | |
| 151 | + * @param combiner the <code>DomainCombiner</code> to be associated | |
| 152 | + * with the provided <code>AccessControlContext</code>. | |
| 153 | + * | |
| 154 | + * @exception NullPointerException if the provided | |
| 155 | + * <code>context</code> is <code>null</code>. | |
| 156 | + * | |
| 157 | + * @exception SecurityException if a security manager is installed and the | |
| 158 | + * caller does not have the "createAccessControlContext" | |
| 159 | + * {@link SecurityPermission} | |
| 160 | + * @since 1.3 | |
| 161 | + */ | |
| 162 | + public AccessControlContext(AccessControlContext acc, | |
| 163 | + DomainCombiner combiner) { | |
| 164 | + | |
| 165 | + SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager(); | |
| 166 | + if (sm != null) { | |
| 167 | + sm.checkPermission(SecurityConstants.CREATE_ACC_PERMISSION); | |
| 168 | + } | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + this.context = acc.context; | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + // we do not need to run the combine method on the | |
| 173 | + // provided ACC. it was already "combined" when the | |
| 174 | + // context was originally retrieved. | |
| 175 | + // | |
| 176 | + // at this point in time, we simply throw away the old | |
| 177 | + // combiner and use the newly provided one. | |
| 178 | + this.combiner = combiner; | |
| 179 | + } | |
| 180 | + | |
| 181 | + /** | |
| 182 | + * package private for AccessController | |
| 183 | + */ | |
| 184 | + AccessControlContext(ProtectionDomain context[], DomainCombiner combiner) { | |
| 185 | + if (context != null) { | |
| 186 | + this.context = context.clone(); | |
| 187 | + } | |
| 188 | + this.combiner = combiner; | |
| 189 | + } | |
| 190 | + | |
| 191 | + /** | |
| 192 | + * package private constructor for AccessController.getContext() | |
| 193 | + */ | |
| 194 | + | |
| 195 | + AccessControlContext(ProtectionDomain context[], | |
| 196 | + boolean isPrivileged) | |
| 197 | + { | |
| 198 | + this.context = context; | |
| 199 | + this.isPrivileged = isPrivileged; | |
| 200 | + } | |
| 201 | + | |
| 202 | + /** | |
| 203 | + * Constructor for JavaSecurityAccess.doIntersectionPrivilege() | |
| 204 | + */ | |
| 205 | + AccessControlContext(ProtectionDomain[] context, | |
| 206 | + AccessControlContext privilegedContext) | |
| 207 | + { | |
| 208 | + this.context = context; | |
| 209 | + this.privilegedContext = privilegedContext; | |
| 210 | + this.isPrivileged = true; | |
| 211 | + } | |
| 212 | + | |
| 213 | + /** | |
| 214 | + * Returns this context's context. | |
| 215 | + */ | |
| 216 | + ProtectionDomain[] getContext() { | |
| 217 | + return context; | |
| 218 | + } | |
| 219 | + | |
| 220 | + /** | |
| 221 | + * Returns true if this context is privileged. | |
| 222 | + */ | |
| 223 | + boolean isPrivileged() | |
| 224 | + { | |
| 225 | + return isPrivileged; | |
| 226 | + } | |
| 227 | + | |
| 228 | + /** | |
| 229 | + * get the assigned combiner from the privileged or inherited context | |
| 230 | + */ | |
| 231 | + DomainCombiner getAssignedCombiner() { | |
| 232 | + AccessControlContext acc; | |
| 233 | + if (isPrivileged) { | |
| 234 | + acc = privilegedContext; | |
| 235 | + } else { | |
| 236 | + acc = AccessController.getInheritedAccessControlContext(); | |
| 237 | + } | |
| 238 | + if (acc != null) { | |
| 239 | + return acc.combiner; | |
| 240 | + } | |
| 241 | + return null; | |
| 242 | + } | |
| 243 | + | |
| 244 | + /** | |
| 245 | + * Get the <code>DomainCombiner</code> associated with this | |
| 246 | + * <code>AccessControlContext</code>. | |
| 247 | + * | |
| 248 | + * <p> | |
| 249 | + * | |
| 250 | + * @return the <code>DomainCombiner</code> associated with this | |
| 251 | + * <code>AccessControlContext</code>, or <code>null</code> | |
| 252 | + * if there is none. | |
| 253 | + * | |
| 254 | + * @exception SecurityException if a security manager is installed and | |
| 255 | + * the caller does not have the "getDomainCombiner" | |
| 256 | + * {@link SecurityPermission} | |
| 257 | + * @since 1.3 | |
| 258 | + */ | |
| 259 | + public DomainCombiner getDomainCombiner() { | |
| 260 | + | |
| 261 | + SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager(); | |
| 262 | + if (sm != null) { | |
| 263 | + sm.checkPermission(SecurityConstants.GET_COMBINER_PERMISSION); | |
| 264 | + } | |
| 265 | + return combiner; | |
| 266 | + } | |
| 267 | + | |
| 268 | + /** | |
| 269 | + * Determines whether the access request indicated by the | |
| 270 | + * specified permission should be allowed or denied, based on | |
| 271 | + * the security policy currently in effect, and the context in | |
| 272 | + * this object. The request is allowed only if every ProtectionDomain | |
| 273 | + * in the context implies the permission. Otherwise the request is | |
| 274 | + * denied. | |
| 275 | + * | |
| 276 | + * <p> | |
| 277 | + * This method quietly returns if the access request | |
| 278 | + * is permitted, or throws a suitable AccessControlException otherwise. | |
| 279 | + * | |
| 280 | + * @param perm the requested permission. | |
| 281 | + * | |
| 282 | + * @exception AccessControlException if the specified permission | |
| 283 | + * is not permitted, based on the current security policy and the | |
| 284 | + * context encapsulated by this object. | |
| 285 | + * @exception NullPointerException if the permission to check for is null. | |
| 286 | + */ | |
| 287 | + public void checkPermission(Permission perm) | |
| 288 | + throws AccessControlException | |
| 289 | + { | |
| 290 | + boolean dumpDebug = false; | |
| 291 | + | |
| 292 | + if (perm == null) { | |
| 293 | + throw new NullPointerException("permission can't be null"); | |
| 294 | + } | |
| 295 | + if (getDebug() != null) { | |
| 296 | + // If "codebase" is not specified, we dump the info by default. | |
| 297 | + dumpDebug = !Debug.isOn("codebase="); | |
| 298 | + if (!dumpDebug) { | |
| 299 | + // If "codebase" is specified, only dump if the specified code | |
| 300 | + // value is in the stack. | |
| 301 | + for (int i = 0; context != null && i < context.length; i++) { | |
| 302 | + if (context[i].getCodeSource() != null && | |
| 303 | + context[i].getCodeSource().getLocation() != null && | |
| 304 | + Debug.isOn("codebase=" + context[i].getCodeSource().getLocation().toString())) { | |
| 305 | + dumpDebug = true; | |
| 306 | + break; | |
| 307 | + } | |
| 308 | + } | |
| 309 | + } | |
| 310 | + | |
| 311 | + dumpDebug &= !Debug.isOn("permission=") || | |
| 312 | + Debug.isOn("permission=" + perm.getClass().getCanonicalName()); | |
| 313 | + | |
| 314 | + if (dumpDebug && Debug.isOn("stack")) { | |
| 315 | + Thread.currentThread().dumpStack(); | |
| 316 | + } | |
| 317 | + | |
| 318 | + if (dumpDebug && Debug.isOn("domain")) { | |
| 319 | + if (context == null) { | |
| 320 | + debug.println("domain (context is null)"); | |
| 321 | + } else { | |
| 322 | + for (int i=0; i< context.length; i++) { | |
| 323 | + debug.println("domain "+i+" "+context[i]); | |
| 324 | + } | |
| 325 | + } | |
| 326 | + } | |
| 327 | + } | |
| 328 | + | |
| 329 | + /* | |
| 330 | + * iterate through the ProtectionDomains in the context. | |
| 331 | + * Stop at the first one that doesn't allow the | |
| 332 | + * requested permission (throwing an exception). | |
| 333 | + * | |
| 334 | + */ | |
| 335 | + | |
| 336 | + /* if ctxt is null, all we had on the stack were system domains, | |
| 337 | + or the first domain was a Privileged system domain. This | |
| 338 | + is to make the common case for system code very fast */ | |
| 339 | + | |
| 340 | + if (context == null) | |
| 341 | + return; | |
| 342 | + | |
| 343 | + for (int i=0; i< context.length; i++) { | |
| 344 | + if (context[i] != null && !context[i].implies(perm)) { | |
| 345 | + if (dumpDebug) { | |
| 346 | + debug.println("access denied " + perm); | |
| 347 | + } | |
| 348 | + | |
| 349 | + if (Debug.isOn("failure") && debug != null) { | |
| 350 | + // Want to make sure this is always displayed for failure, | |
| 351 | + // but do not want to display again if already displayed | |
| 352 | + // above. | |
| 353 | + if (!dumpDebug) { | |
| 354 | + debug.println("access denied " + perm); | |
| 355 | + } | |
| 356 | + Thread.currentThread().dumpStack(); | |
| 357 | + final ProtectionDomain pd = context[i]; | |
| 358 | + final Debug db = debug; | |
| 359 | + AccessController.doPrivileged (new PrivilegedAction<Void>() { | |
| 360 | + public Void run() { | |
| 361 | + db.println("domain that failed "+pd); | |
| 362 | + return null; | |
| 363 | + } | |
| 364 | + }); | |
| 365 | + } | |
| 366 | + throw new AccessControlException("access denied "+perm, perm); | |
| 367 | + } | |
| 368 | + } | |
| 369 | + | |
| 370 | + // allow if all of them allowed access | |
| 371 | + if (dumpDebug) { | |
| 372 | + debug.println("access allowed "+perm); | |
| 373 | + } | |
| 374 | + | |
| 375 | + return; | |
| 376 | + } | |
| 377 | + | |
| 378 | + /** | |
| 379 | + * Take the stack-based context (this) and combine it with the | |
| 380 | + * privileged or inherited context, if need be. | |
| 381 | + */ | |
| 382 | + AccessControlContext optimize() { | |
| 383 | + // the assigned (privileged or inherited) context | |
| 384 | + AccessControlContext acc; | |
| 385 | + if (isPrivileged) { | |
| 386 | + acc = privilegedContext; | |
| 387 | + } else { | |
| 388 | + acc = AccessController.getInheritedAccessControlContext(); | |
| 389 | + } | |
| 390 | + | |
| 391 | + // this.context could be null if only system code is on the stack; | |
| 392 | + // in that case, ignore the stack context | |
| 393 | + boolean skipStack = (context == null); | |
| 394 | + | |
| 395 | + // acc.context could be null if only system code was involved; | |
| 396 | + // in that case, ignore the assigned context | |
| 397 | + boolean skipAssigned = (acc == null || acc.context == null); | |
| 398 | + | |
| 399 | + if (acc != null && acc.combiner != null) { | |
| 400 | + // let the assigned acc's combiner do its thing | |
| 401 | + return goCombiner(context, acc); | |
| 402 | + } | |
| 403 | + | |
| 404 | + // optimization: if neither have contexts; return acc if possible | |
| 405 | + // rather than this, because acc might have a combiner | |
| 406 | + if (skipAssigned && skipStack) { | |
| 407 | + return this; | |
| 408 | + } | |
| 409 | + | |
| 410 | + // optimization: if there is no stack context; there is no reason | |
| 411 | + // to compress the assigned context, it already is compressed | |
| 412 | + if (skipStack) { | |
| 413 | + return acc; | |
| 414 | + } | |
| 415 | + | |
| 416 | + int slen = context.length; | |
| 417 | + | |
| 418 | + // optimization: if there is no assigned context and the stack length | |
| 419 | + // is less then or equal to two; there is no reason to compress the | |
| 420 | + // stack context, it already is | |
| 421 | + if (skipAssigned && slen <= 2) { | |
| 422 | + return this; | |
| 423 | + } | |
| 424 | + | |
| 425 | + // optimization: if there is a single stack domain and that domain | |
| 426 | + // is already in the assigned context; no need to combine | |
| 427 | + if ((slen == 1) && (context[0] == acc.context[0])) { | |
| 428 | + return acc; | |
| 429 | + } | |
| 430 | + | |
| 431 | + int n = (skipAssigned) ? 0 : acc.context.length; | |
| 432 | + | |
| 433 | + // now we combine both of them, and create a new context | |
| 434 | + ProtectionDomain pd[] = new ProtectionDomain[slen + n]; | |
| 435 | + | |
| 436 | + // first copy in the assigned context domains, no need to compress | |
| 437 | + if (!skipAssigned) { | |
| 438 | + System.arraycopy(acc.context, 0, pd, 0, n); | |
| 439 | + } | |
| 440 | + | |
| 441 | + // now add the stack context domains, discarding nulls and duplicates | |
| 442 | + outer: | |
| 443 | + for (int i = 0; i < context.length; i++) { | |
| 444 | + ProtectionDomain sd = context[i]; | |
| 445 | + if (sd != null) { | |
| 446 | + for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) { | |
| 447 | + if (sd == pd[j]) { | |
| 448 | + continue outer; | |
| 449 | + } | |
| 450 | + } | |
| 451 | + pd[n++] = sd; | |
| 452 | + } | |
| 453 | + } | |
| 454 | + | |
| 455 | + // if length isn't equal, we need to shorten the array | |
| 456 | + if (n != pd.length) { | |
| 457 | + // optimization: if we didn't really combine anything | |
| 458 | + if (!skipAssigned && n == acc.context.length) { | |
| 459 | + return acc; | |
| 460 | + } else if (skipAssigned && n == slen) { | |
| 461 | + return this; | |
| 462 | + } | |
| 463 | + ProtectionDomain tmp[] = new ProtectionDomain[n]; | |
| 464 | + System.arraycopy(pd, 0, tmp, 0, n); | |
| 465 | + pd = tmp; | |
| 466 | + } | |
| 467 | + | |
| 468 | + // return new AccessControlContext(pd, false); | |
| 469 | + | |
| 470 | + // Reuse existing ACC | |
| 471 | + | |
| 472 | + this.context = pd; | |
| 473 | + this.combiner = null; | |
| 474 | + this.isPrivileged = false; | |
| 475 | + | |
| 476 | + return this; | |
| 477 | + } | |
| 478 | + | |
| 479 | + private AccessControlContext goCombiner(ProtectionDomain[] current, | |
| 480 | + AccessControlContext assigned) { | |
| 481 | + | |
| 482 | + // the assigned ACC's combiner is not null -- | |
| 483 | + // let the combiner do its thing | |
| 484 | + | |
| 485 | + // XXX we could add optimizations to 'current' here ... | |
| 486 | + | |
| 487 | + if (getDebug() != null) { | |
| 488 | + debug.println("AccessControlContext invoking the Combiner"); | |
| 489 | + } | |
| 490 | + | |
| 491 | + // No need to clone current and assigned.context | |
| 492 | + // combine() will not update them | |
| 493 | + ProtectionDomain[] combinedPds = assigned.combiner.combine( | |
| 494 | + current, assigned.context); | |
| 495 | + | |
| 496 | + // return new AccessControlContext(combinedPds, assigned.combiner); | |
| 497 | + | |
| 498 | + // Reuse existing ACC | |
| 499 | + this.context = combinedPds; | |
| 500 | + this.combiner = assigned.combiner; | |
| 501 | + this.isPrivileged = false; | |
| 502 | + | |
| 503 | + return this; | |
| 504 | + } | |
| 505 | + | |
| 506 | + /** | |
| 507 | + * Checks two AccessControlContext objects for equality. | |
| 508 | + * Checks that <i>obj</i> is | |
| 509 | + * an AccessControlContext and has the same set of ProtectionDomains | |
| 510 | + * as this context. | |
| 511 | + * <P> | |
| 512 | + * @param obj the object we are testing for equality with this object. | |
| 513 | + * @return true if <i>obj</i> is an AccessControlContext, and has the | |
| 514 | + * same set of ProtectionDomains as this context, false otherwise. | |
| 515 | + */ | |
| 516 | + public boolean equals(Object obj) { | |
| 517 | + if (obj == this) | |
| 518 | + return true; | |
| 519 | + | |
| 520 | + if (! (obj instanceof AccessControlContext)) | |
| 521 | + return false; | |
| 522 | + | |
| 523 | + AccessControlContext that = (AccessControlContext) obj; | |
| 524 | + | |
| 525 | + | |
| 526 | + if (context == null) { | |
| 527 | + return (that.context == null); | |
| 528 | + } | |
| 529 | + | |
| 530 | + if (that.context == null) | |
| 531 | + return false; | |
| 532 | + | |
| 533 | + if (!(this.containsAllPDs(that) && that.containsAllPDs(this))) | |
| 534 | + return false; | |
| 535 | + | |
| 536 | + if (this.combiner == null) | |
| 537 | + return (that.combiner == null); | |
| 538 | + | |
| 539 | + if (that.combiner == null) | |
| 540 | + return false; | |
| 541 | + | |
| 542 | + if (!this.combiner.equals(that.combiner)) | |
| 543 | + return false; | |
| 544 | + | |
| 545 | + return true; | |
| 546 | + } | |
| 547 | + | |
| 548 | + private boolean containsAllPDs(AccessControlContext that) { | |
| 549 | + boolean match = false; | |
| 550 | + // | |
| 551 | + // ProtectionDomains within an ACC currently cannot be null | |
| 552 | + // and this is enforced by the constructor and the various | |
| 553 | + // optimize methods. However, historically this logic made attempts | |
| 554 | + // to support the notion of a null PD and therefore this logic continues | |
| 555 | + // to support that notion. | |
| 556 | + ProtectionDomain thisPd; | |
| 557 | + for (int i = 0; i < context.length; i++) { | |
| 558 | + match = false; | |
| 559 | + if ((thisPd = context[i]) == null) { | |
| 560 | + for (int j = 0; (j < that.context.length) && !match; j++) { | |
| 561 | + match = (that.context[j] == null); | |
| 562 | + } | |
| 563 | + } else { | |
| 564 | + Class thisPdClass = thisPd.getClass(); | |
| 565 | + ProtectionDomain thatPd; | |
| 566 | + for (int j = 0; (j < that.context.length) && !match; j++) { | |
| 567 | + thatPd = that.context[j]; | |
| 568 | + | |
| 569 | + // Class check required to avoid PD exposure (4285406) | |
| 570 | + match = (thatPd != null && | |
| 571 | + thisPdClass == thatPd.getClass() && thisPd.equals(thatPd)); | |
| 572 | + } | |
| 573 | + } | |
| 574 | + if (!match) return false; | |
| 575 | + } | |
| 576 | + return match; | |
| 577 | + } | |
| 578 | + /** | |
| 579 | + * Returns the hash code value for this context. The hash code | |
| 580 | + * is computed by exclusive or-ing the hash code of all the protection | |
| 581 | + * domains in the context together. | |
| 582 | + * | |
| 583 | + * @return a hash code value for this context. | |
| 584 | + */ | |
| 585 | + | |
| 586 | + public int hashCode() { | |
| 587 | + int hashCode = 0; | |
| 588 | + | |
| 589 | + if (context == null) | |
| 590 | + return hashCode; | |
| 591 | + | |
| 592 | + for (int i =0; i < context.length; i++) { | |
| 593 | + if (context[i] != null) | |
| 594 | + hashCode ^= context[i].hashCode(); | |
| 595 | + } | |
| 596 | + return hashCode; | |
| 597 | + } | |
| 598 | +} | |