// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0/* * Variant of atomic_t specialized for reference counts. * * The interface matches the atomic_t interface (to aid in porting) but only * provides the few functions one should use for reference counting. * * It differs in that the counter saturates at UINT_MAX and will not move once * there. This avoids wrapping the counter and causing 'spurious' * use-after-free issues. * * Memory ordering rules are slightly relaxed wrt regular atomic_t functions * and provide only what is strictly required for refcounts. * * The increments are fully relaxed; these will not provide ordering. The * rationale is that whatever is used to obtain the object we're increasing the * reference count on will provide the ordering. For locked data structures, * its the lock acquire, for RCU/lockless data structures its the dependent * load. * * Do note that inc_not_zero() provides a control dependency which will order * future stores against the inc, this ensures we'll never modify the object * if we did not in fact acquire a reference. * * The decrements will provide release order, such that all the prior loads and * stores will be issued before, it also provides a control dependency, which * will order us against the subsequent free(). * * The control dependency is against the load of the cmpxchg (ll/sc) that * succeeded. This means the stores aren't fully ordered, but this is fine * because the 1->0 transition indicates no concurrency. * * Note that the allocator is responsible for ordering things between free() * and alloc(). * * The decrements dec_and_test() and sub_and_test() also provide acquire * ordering on success. * */ #include <linux/mutex.h>#include <linux/refcount.h>#include <linux/spinlock.h>#include <linux/bug.h> /** * refcount_add_not_zero_checked - add a value to a refcount unless it is 0 * @i: the value to add to the refcount * @r: the refcount * * Will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN. * * Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the * object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency * and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top. * * Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting * use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these * cases, refcount_inc(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to * increment a reference count. * * Return: false if the passed refcount is 0, true otherwise */bool refcount_add_not_zero_checked(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r){ unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs); do { if (!val) return false; if (unlikely(val == UINT_MAX)) return true; new = val + i; if (new < val) new = UINT_MAX; } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&r->refs, &val, new)); WARN_ONCE(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n"); return true;}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_add_not_zero_checked); /** * refcount_add_checked - add a value to a refcount * @i: the value to add to the refcount * @r: the refcount * * Similar to atomic_add(), but will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN. * * Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the * object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency * and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top. * * Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting * use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these * cases, refcount_inc(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to * increment a reference count. */void refcount_add_checked(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r){ WARN_ONCE(!refcount_add_not_zero_checked(i, r), "refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n");}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_add_checked); /** * refcount_inc_not_zero_checked - increment a refcount unless it is 0 * @r: the refcount to increment * * Similar to atomic_inc_not_zero(), but will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN. * * Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the * object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency * and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top. * * Return: true if the increment was successful, false otherwise */bool refcount_inc_not_zero_checked(refcount_t *r){ unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs); do { new = val + 1; if (!val) return false; if (unlikely(!new)) return true; } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&r->refs, &val, new)); WARN_ONCE(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n"); return true;}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_inc_not_zero_checked); /** * refcount_inc_checked - increment a refcount * @r: the refcount to increment * * Similar to atomic_inc(), but will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN. * * Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller already has a * reference on the object. * * Will WARN if the refcount is 0, as this represents a possible use-after-free * condition. */void refcount_inc_checked(refcount_t *r){ WARN_ONCE(!refcount_inc_not_zero_checked(r), "refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free.\n");}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_inc_checked); /** * refcount_sub_and_test_checked - subtract from a refcount and test if it is 0 * @i: amount to subtract from the refcount * @r: the refcount * * Similar to atomic_dec_and_test(), but it will WARN, return false and * ultimately leak on underflow and will fail to decrement when saturated * at UINT_MAX. * * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done * before, and provides an acquire ordering on success such that free() * must come after. * * Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting * use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these * cases, refcount_dec(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to * decrement a reference count. * * Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise */bool refcount_sub_and_test_checked(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r){ unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs); do { if (unlikely(val == UINT_MAX)) return false; new = val - i; if (new > val) { WARN_ONCE(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n"); return false; } } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, &val, new)); if (!new) { smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(); return true; } return false; }EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_sub_and_test_checked); /** * refcount_dec_and_test_checked - decrement a refcount and test if it is 0 * @r: the refcount * * Similar to atomic_dec_and_test(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to * decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX. * * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done * before, and provides an acquire ordering on success such that free() * must come after. * * Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise */bool refcount_dec_and_test_checked(refcount_t *r){ return refcount_sub_and_test_checked(1, r);}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_test_checked); /** * refcount_dec_checked - decrement a refcount * @r: the refcount * * Similar to atomic_dec(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to decrement * when saturated at UINT_MAX. * * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done * before. */void refcount_dec_checked(refcount_t *r){ WARN_ONCE(refcount_dec_and_test_checked(r), "refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n");}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_checked); /** * refcount_dec_if_one - decrement a refcount if it is 1 * @r: the refcount * * No atomic_t counterpart, it attempts a 1 -> 0 transition and returns the * success thereof. * * Like all decrement operations, it provides release memory order and provides * a control dependency. * * It can be used like a try-delete operator; this explicit case is provided * and not cmpxchg in generic, because that would allow implementing unsafe * operations. * * Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise */bool refcount_dec_if_one(refcount_t *r){ int val = 1; return atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, &val, 0);}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_if_one); /** * refcount_dec_not_one - decrement a refcount if it is not 1 * @r: the refcount * * No atomic_t counterpart, it decrements unless the value is 1, in which case * it will return false. * * Was often done like: atomic_add_unless(&var, -1, 1) * * Return: true if the decrement operation was successful, false otherwise */bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r){ unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs); do { if (unlikely(val == UINT_MAX)) return true; if (val == 1) return false; new = val - 1; if (new > val) { WARN_ONCE(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n"); return true; } } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, &val, new)); return true;}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_not_one); /** * refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock - return holding mutex if able to decrement * refcount to 0 * @r: the refcount * @lock: the mutex to be locked * * Similar to atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(), it will WARN on underflow and fail * to decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX. * * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done * before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after. * See the comment on top. * * Return: true and hold mutex if able to decrement refcount to 0, false * otherwise */bool refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(refcount_t *r, struct mutex *lock){ if (refcount_dec_not_one(r)) return false; mutex_lock(lock); if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) { mutex_unlock(lock); return false; } return true;}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock); /** * refcount_dec_and_lock - return holding spinlock if able to decrement * refcount to 0 * @r: the refcount * @lock: the spinlock to be locked * * Similar to atomic_dec_and_lock(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to * decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX. * * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done * before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after. * See the comment on top. * * Return: true and hold spinlock if able to decrement refcount to 0, false * otherwise */bool refcount_dec_and_lock(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock){ if (refcount_dec_not_one(r)) return false; spin_lock(lock); if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) { spin_unlock(lock); return false; } return true;}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_lock); /** * refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave - return holding spinlock with disabled * interrupts if able to decrement refcount to 0 * @r: the refcount * @lock: the spinlock to be locked * @flags: saved IRQ-flags if the is acquired * * Same as refcount_dec_and_lock() above except that the spinlock is acquired * with disabled interupts. * * Return: true and hold spinlock if able to decrement refcount to 0, false * otherwise */bool refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags){ if (refcount_dec_not_one(r)) return false; spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *flags); if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags); return false; } return true;}EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave);
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Variant of atomic_t specialized for reference counts.
*
* The interface matches the atomic_t interface (to aid in porting) but only
* provides the few functions one should use for reference counting.
*
* It differs in that the counter saturates at UINT_MAX and will not move once
* there. This avoids wrapping the counter and causing 'spurious'
* use-after-free issues.
*
* Memory ordering rules are slightly relaxed wrt regular atomic_t functions
* and provide only what is strictly required for refcounts.
*
* The increments are fully relaxed; these will not provide ordering. The
* rationale is that whatever is used to obtain the object we're increasing the
* reference count on will provide the ordering. For locked data structures,
* its the lock acquire, for RCU/lockless data structures its the dependent
* load.
*
* Do note that inc_not_zero() provides a control dependency which will order
* future stores against the inc, this ensures we'll never modify the object
* if we did not in fact acquire a reference.
*
* The decrements will provide release order, such that all the prior loads and
* stores will be issued before, it also provides a control dependency, which
* will order us against the subsequent free().
*
* The control dependency is against the load of the cmpxchg (ll/sc) that
* succeeded. This means the stores aren't fully ordered, but this is fine
* because the 1->0 transition indicates no concurrency.
*
* Note that the allocator is responsible for ordering things between free()
* and alloc().
*
* The decrements dec_and_test() and sub_and_test() also provide acquire
* ordering on success.
*
*/
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/refcount.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
/**
* refcount_add_not_zero_checked - add a value to a refcount unless it is 0
* @i: the value to add to the refcount
* @r: the refcount
*
* Will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN.
*
* Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the
* object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency
* and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top.
*
* Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting
* use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these
* cases, refcount_inc(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to
* increment a reference count.
*
* Return: false if the passed refcount is 0, true otherwise
*/
bool refcount_add_not_zero_checked(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
{
unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
do {
if (!val)
return false;
if (unlikely(val == UINT_MAX))
return true;
new = val + i;
if (new < val)
new = UINT_MAX;
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&r->refs, &val, new));
WARN_ONCE(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_add_not_zero_checked);
/**
* refcount_add_checked - add a value to a refcount
* @i: the value to add to the refcount
* @r: the refcount
*
* Similar to atomic_add(), but will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN.
*
* Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the
* object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency
* and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top.
*
* Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting
* use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these
* cases, refcount_inc(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to
* increment a reference count.
*/
void refcount_add_checked(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
{
WARN_ONCE(!refcount_add_not_zero_checked(i, r), "refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_add_checked);
/**
* refcount_inc_not_zero_checked - increment a refcount unless it is 0
* @r: the refcount to increment
*
* Similar to atomic_inc_not_zero(), but will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN.
*
* Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the
* object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency
* and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top.
*
* Return: true if the increment was successful, false otherwise
*/
bool refcount_inc_not_zero_checked(refcount_t *r)
{
unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
do {
new = val + 1;
if (!val)
return false;
if (unlikely(!new))
return true;
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&r->refs, &val, new));
WARN_ONCE(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_inc_not_zero_checked);
/**
* refcount_inc_checked - increment a refcount
* @r: the refcount to increment
*
* Similar to atomic_inc(), but will saturate at UINT_MAX and WARN.
*
* Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller already has a
* reference on the object.
*
* Will WARN if the refcount is 0, as this represents a possible use-after-free
* condition.
*/
void refcount_inc_checked(refcount_t *r)
{
WARN_ONCE(!refcount_inc_not_zero_checked(r), "refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free.\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_inc_checked);
/**
* refcount_sub_and_test_checked - subtract from a refcount and test if it is 0
* @i: amount to subtract from the refcount
* @r: the refcount
*
* Similar to atomic_dec_and_test(), but it will WARN, return false and
* ultimately leak on underflow and will fail to decrement when saturated
* at UINT_MAX.
*
* Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
* before, and provides an acquire ordering on success such that free()
* must come after.
*
* Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting
* use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these
* cases, refcount_dec(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to
* decrement a reference count.
*
* Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise
*/
bool refcount_sub_and_test_checked(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
{
unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
do {
if (unlikely(val == UINT_MAX))
return false;
new = val - i;
if (new > val) {
WARN_ONCE(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n");
return false;
}
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, &val, new));
if (!new) {
smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
return true;
}
return false;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_sub_and_test_checked);
/**
* refcount_dec_and_test_checked - decrement a refcount and test if it is 0
* @r: the refcount
*
* Similar to atomic_dec_and_test(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to
* decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX.
*
* Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
* before, and provides an acquire ordering on success such that free()
* must come after.
*
* Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise
*/
bool refcount_dec_and_test_checked(refcount_t *r)
{
return refcount_sub_and_test_checked(1, r);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_test_checked);
/**
* refcount_dec_checked - decrement a refcount
* @r: the refcount
*
* Similar to atomic_dec(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to decrement
* when saturated at UINT_MAX.
*
* Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
* before.
*/
void refcount_dec_checked(refcount_t *r)
{
WARN_ONCE(refcount_dec_and_test_checked(r), "refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_checked);
/**
* refcount_dec_if_one - decrement a refcount if it is 1
* @r: the refcount
*
* No atomic_t counterpart, it attempts a 1 -> 0 transition and returns the
* success thereof.
*
* Like all decrement operations, it provides release memory order and provides
* a control dependency.
*
* It can be used like a try-delete operator; this explicit case is provided
* and not cmpxchg in generic, because that would allow implementing unsafe
* operations.
*
* Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise
*/
bool refcount_dec_if_one(refcount_t *r)
{
int val = 1;
return atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, &val, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_if_one);
/**
* refcount_dec_not_one - decrement a refcount if it is not 1
* @r: the refcount
*
* No atomic_t counterpart, it decrements unless the value is 1, in which case
* it will return false.
*
* Was often done like: atomic_add_unless(&var, -1, 1)
*
* Return: true if the decrement operation was successful, false otherwise
*/
bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r)
{
unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
do {
if (unlikely(val == UINT_MAX))
return true;
if (val == 1)
return false;
new = val - 1;
if (new > val) {
WARN_ONCE(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n");
return true;
}
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, &val, new));
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_not_one);
/**
* refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock - return holding mutex if able to decrement
* refcount to 0
* @r: the refcount
* @lock: the mutex to be locked
*
* Similar to atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(), it will WARN on underflow and fail
* to decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX.
*
* Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
* before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after.
* See the comment on top.
*
* Return: true and hold mutex if able to decrement refcount to 0, false
* otherwise
*/
bool refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(refcount_t *r, struct mutex *lock)
{
if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
return false;
mutex_lock(lock);
if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
mutex_unlock(lock);
return false;
}
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock);
/**
* refcount_dec_and_lock - return holding spinlock if able to decrement
* refcount to 0
* @r: the refcount
* @lock: the spinlock to be locked
*
* Similar to atomic_dec_and_lock(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to
* decrement when saturated at UINT_MAX.
*
* Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
* before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after.
* See the comment on top.
*
* Return: true and hold spinlock if able to decrement refcount to 0, false
* otherwise
*/
bool refcount_dec_and_lock(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock)
{
if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
return false;
spin_lock(lock);
if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
spin_unlock(lock);
return false;
}
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_lock);
/**
* refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave - return holding spinlock with disabled
* interrupts if able to decrement refcount to 0
* @r: the refcount
* @lock: the spinlock to be locked
* @flags: saved IRQ-flags if the is acquired
*
* Same as refcount_dec_and_lock() above except that the spinlock is acquired
* with disabled interupts.
*
* Return: true and hold spinlock if able to decrement refcount to 0, false
* otherwise
*/
bool refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock,
unsigned long *flags)
{
if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
return false;
spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *flags);
if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
return false;
}
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave);