History

bpf: Avoid old-style declaration warnings

gcc -Wextra wants type modifiers in the normal order: kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c:70:1: error: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration] 70 | const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = { | ^~~~~ kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c:91:1: error: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration] 91 | const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = { | ^~~~~

Arnd Bergmann committed 5 years ago

Commit e2c69f31 parent 78b226d1 file · +2 −2Browse files

Showing the changes to kernel (1 of 1 file). Show all

Unified · Split

kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c+2−2
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_bprm_opts_set, struct linux_binprm *, bprm, u64, flags) · 66 unmodified lines
6767
6868 BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_bprm_opts_set_btf_ids, struct, linux_binprm)
6969
70−const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
70+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
7171 .func = bpf_bprm_opts_set,
7272 .gpl_only = false,
7373 .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static bool bpf_ima_inode_hash_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog) · 14 unmodified lines
8888
8989 BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_ima_inode_hash_btf_ids, struct, inode)
9090
91−const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = {
91+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = {
9292 .func = bpf_ima_inode_hash,
9393 .gpl_only = false,
9494 .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,

Keyboard shortcuts

General

Show keyboard shortcuts
?
Focus the current search
/

Issues and pull requests

Open filters
f

Issues, pull requests and Inbox

Select next item
j↓
Select previous item
k↑
Open selected item
Enter
Dismiss filters or clear selection
Esc

Repository code

Go to file
t